J-pole is back and ready for action! And with my improvements since earlier, it's better than ever! :D
(I had to move it indoors because of exterior maintenance. :( )
like this
Finally finished my in-depth experimentation on toroid baluns last night. Turns out that the simplest solution is often the best: a traditional transformer acting as a voltage balun did the trick!
I was a bit dismayed with the narrow bandwidth of my system with the copper pipe dipole with a 4:3 step-down ratio (it hit the center of 6m, but the SWR at the FT8 frequency wasn't as good), but but changing to 6:3 (5:3 didn't work at all) brought the resonant frequency down and got one of the best SWR readings I've seen. 👍
My plan is to have a switch on the balun to select between the 4:3 and 6:3.
like this
like this
like this
Aladár Mézga likes this.
#AmateurRadio #HamRadio
It would make a ton of sense to have the transceiver's dial control both the VFO and the tuning capacitor of a magloop antenna. :3c
W6KME likes this.
build a mag loop drive with positional feedback. Build a controller that speaks your transceivers CAT protocol. Profit.
The controller probably needs some sort of calibration procedure: sweep through the frequencies and measure drive position.
Neil E. Hodges likes this.
Switching to an autotransformer got the resistive impedance really close to 50Ω. 👀
I'll need 17pF to knock out that inductive reactance, but that's cheap to do. :D
like this
Looks like I need 11 pF to knock out that inductive reactance. One option here is a capacitor made out of a coax stub:
(%i5) evalf(capacitive_stub(51000000, 1.1237613102861413e-11, 1, 50));
(%o5) 4.5753751940965905Probably more cost-effective to get some ceramic capacitors. :P
like this
Neil E. Hodges likes this.
bazkie 👩🏼💻 bitplanes 🎵 likes this.
Finally made some real progress on the magloop after adding a 100 pF capacitor in parallel to the 5-250 pF variable capacitor…at least on 80m. Now there's too much capacitance to hit 40m. 
The SWR on 80m is really good. When I tested FT8 at 100 W, it was around 1.1. :D
But there's a lot of noise. :(
Aw man, something just fried. The SWR jumped from 1.1 to way high out of nowhere. I'm guessing it's "The Doohickey" since that switch probably wasn't really rated for 100 W. :P
Time to build a new one that includes what I learned building the first one! I'll still use the same coil and so on, but I'll have to cut the switch out and toss it. The upside is that I already ordered a pair of beefy switches, using one for disabling the magloop's fixed capacitor and having an extra one, so that means I won't have to wait as long! :3
like this
SilenceisGolden likes this.
This one looks like a Ukrainian visiting California. 👀
250806_233400 50.313 Tx FT8 0 0.0 947 <W6/UT5UF> KM7BCS R-13like this
Neil E. Hodges likes this.
Victoria (K8VSY) (she/her) likes this.
Victoria (K8VSY) (she/her) likes this.
Neil E. Hodges likes this.
AI6YR Ben likes this.
Architecture | PeerTube documentation
Documentation of PeerTube, a free software to take back control of your videos!docs.joinpeertube.org
Looks like 6 meters is opening up again. Just got a QSO with someone in Nebraska. 👀
Victoria (K8VSY) (she/her) likes this.
Does this seem right? :3c
- Start with a best guess based on the antenna type.
- Analyze with the NanoVNA so that you can measure the resistive and reactive parts of the impedance.
- Depending on the antenna type, you might have to adjust its length. Keep analyzing it as you adjust.
- Add some sort of transformer at the feed point to get the antenna’s resistive part to match 50Ω.
- Analyze again to see what the reactive part looks like after matching the resistive part.
- Add components to the reactive part to 0Ω, which should cause resonance to be achieved as required to obtain a low SWR.
- If the reactive part is positive, add capacitance or remove inductance.
- If the reactive part is negative, add inductance or remove capacitance.
- Connect the antenna to the feed line system.
- If high SWR is reported by the SWR meter, you need to make adjustments between the SWR meter and antenna.
- If high SWR reported by the tranceiver and not the SWR meter, you need to make adjustments between the transceiver and SWR meter.
😀🚲 likes this.
It doesn't "work" yet because I used the "circumference / 10" formula to determine the length of the curved rod in the gamma match, rather than using it to determine the distance between the two terminals where the gamma match joins the main coil. :/
It's much more promising than earlier things I've tried to get this antenna working (coupling loop, toroid coil, etc.).
Since my transceiver can't do the 1.25 meter band, does anyone know of a good transverter that could get me on it?
like this
Was having a weird problem on 2 meter where the SWR reported by my analog SWR meter was around 1.1, but my transceiver was reporting 2.5-3! I tried replacing the cable with two new ones I crimped, of more or less the same length (around 2 feet), but the problem remained. :(
When I put in a pre-made 3 foot cable in, the problem went away! :/
The weirdest thing is that I crimped all of the cabling between the SWR meter and antenna, so is the length of the transceiver–SWR meter leg the issue? :(
like this
reshared this
In my case, the cables weren't bent because I'm using 90° connectors at each device along the line. :3 Oh, I also always check to make sure there's no continuity between the center conductor and shield right after soldering. 👍
I pretty much only have 50 ohm stuff. :P
Figured out a trick of using two thin pieces of masking tape to hold the ring on properly while crimping coaxial connectors to cables. 👍
smellsofbikes likes this.
Anyone know what the correct way of mounting one of these vacuum variable capacitors is? I'm assuming that the top and bottom parts with bolt holes are the two electrodes, but I'm not sure. :/
reshared this
I wonder what this STOP is about.
(It's not in response to me because I haven't transmitted in quite a while.)
190445 2 0.3 2512 ~ VE4RK W7YA -04
190500 2 0.3 235 ~ CI1YFZ ND7M DM16
190500 -4 0.2 2381 ~ AE7U AB9BH CN87
190500 11 0.1 1477 ~ K7FR AI9L +07
190515 -2 0.3 2791 ~ STOP
190515 1 0.3 2512 ~ VE4RK W7YA RR73
190530 0 0.3 235 ~ CI1YFZ ND7M DM16
190530 -2 0.2 2382 ~ AE7U AB9BH R+04
190530 17 0.1 1477 ~ K7FR AI9L RR73
190545 -6 0.3 2791 ~ STOP
190600 6 0.2 2381 ~ AE7U AB9BH 73
190615 25 0.3 2512 ~ VE7FM W7YA DM34
190615 -4 0.3 2791 ~ STOP
190630 22 0.2 1477 ~ WB6JJJ AI9L RR73
190630 -18 0.2 1215 ~ KJ5KL N7RO CN88
190645 27 0.3 2512 ~ VE7FM W7YA R-03
190645 -5 0.3 2791 ~ STOP
190700 -17 0.2 1215 ~ KJ5KL N7RO CN88
190700 -21 0.1 1780 ~ K7FR NR5O DM33
190715 25 0.3 2512 ~ VE7FM W7YA 73
190715 -1 0.3 1913 ~ VE7FM ND7M DM16
190715 -4 0.3 2791 ~ STOP#AmateurRadio #HamRadio
Victoria (K8VSY) (she/her) likes this.
like this
Neil E. Hodges likes this.
Checked in to my first net. My J-pole works great! :D
like this
Finally caught that signal at 146.436 MHz that I've been curious about for a long time. Pretty sure it's DMR. :3
like this
dsd doesn't support reading WAV files, DSD+ is a Windows application, and dsd-fme seems to not support reading files at all despite claiming being able to.% file untitled.wav
untitled.wav: RIFF (little-endian) data, WAVE audio, Microsoft PCM, 16 bit, mono 48000 Hz
% dsd-fme -i untitled.wav
██████╗ ██████╗██████╗ ███████╗███╗ ███╗███████╗
██╔══██╗██╔════╝██╔══██╗ ██╔════╝████╗ ████║██╔════╝
██║ ██║╚█████╗ ██║ ██║ █████╗ ██╔████╔██║█████╗
██║ ██║ ╚═══██╗██║ ██║ ██╔══╝ ██║╚██╔╝██║██╔══╝
██████╔╝██████╔╝██████╔╝ ██║ ██║ ╚═╝ ██║███████╗
╚═════╝ ╚═════╝ ╚═════╝ ╚═╝ ╚═╝ ╚═╝╚══════╝
Build Version: AW 2025-162-g86b8900
MBElib Version: 1.3.0
CODEC2 Support Enabled
Audio In Device: untitled.wav
Err: 6; Connection refused;Input/Output options:
-i <device> Audio input device (default is pulse)
/dev/dsp for OSS audio (Depreciated: Will require padsp wrapper in Linux)
pulse for pulse audio signal input
pulse:6 or pulse:virtual_sink2.monitor for pulse audio signal input on virtual_sink2 (see -O)
rtl for rtl dongle (Default Values -- see below)
rtl:dev:freq:gain:ppm:bw:sq:vol for rtl dongle (see below)
tcp for tcp client SDR++/GNURadio Companion/Other (Port 7355)
tcp:192.168.7.5:7355 for custom address and port
m17udp for M17 UDP/IP socket bind input (default host 127.0.0.1; default port 17000)
m17udp:192.168.7.8:17001 for M17 UDP/IP bind input (Binding Address and Port
filename.bin for OP25/FME capture bin files
filename.wav for 48K/1 wav files (SDR++, GQRX)
filename.wav -s 96000 for 96K/1 wav files (DSDPlus)
(Use single quotes '/directory/audio file.wav' when directories/spaces are present)
% sox untitled.wav -t raw - | dsd -i- -w decoded.wav
Digital Speech Decoder 1.7.0-dev (build:-128-NOTFOUND)
mbelib version 1.3.0
Writing audio to file decoded.wav
Audio In Device: -
Total audio errors: 0
Total header errors: 0
Total irrecoverable header errors: 0
+P25 BER estimate: 0.00%
-P25 BER estimate: 0.00%
Exiting.
% ls -lh decoded.wav
-rw-r--r-- 1 <> users 44 Jul 9 08:43 decoded.wav
% cat decoded.wav
RIFF$WAVEfmt @>data% Eric K3FNB (they/them) likes this.
I'm unsure. I think you can pipe it into dsd. I had more luck with dsdcc.
You may need to convert the wav to the correct bitrate. I'm not sure
Finally got something that's voice, though it's unintelligible.
sox untitled.wav -t raw - | dsdccx -i- -o- | ffmpeg -f s16le -ar 8k -ac 1 -i pipe: decoded.wavAccording to here, those are the correct input and output formats:
- Input as S16LE samples at a fixed rate of 48kS/s
- Audio output as S16LE samples at 8kS/s rate directly out of mbelib or upsampled to 48kS/s
it could be encrypted. Does it sound like someone rustling around in their backpack?
This is a sample I captured of AES256 encrypted DMR voice
https://next.ericcodes.io/s/Eir5iLTtnikoGFK
Needed a tube bender for my next project, but my local hardware store was out of ones that could handle ½" tubing, so I had to order from McMaster–Carr.
like this
~Rye~ likes this.
Neil E. Hodges
Unknown parent • •