Skip to main content


"#US ambassador to #Canada goes on expletive-laced tirade at #Ontario’s trade representative"

It's just so fucking embarrassing

Americans:

WILL YOU PLEASE FUCKING #VOTE

enough of your "BoTh SiDeS tHe SaMe" mindless lies and your "votes don't count anymore" premature spineless capitulation

get off your fucking asses and fucking vote, for the side that sucks, but is obviously better. it matters

incremental improvement works, toxic idealism means shit

https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/ambassador-hoekstra-rant-9.6957854

#PeteHoekstra

This entry was edited (5 months ago)
in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

"enough of your "BoTh SiDeS tHe SaMe" bullshit and your "votes don't count anymore!" premature capitulation spinelessness"

THIS THIS THIS

in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

Anyone saying that they won't vote for people opposing this (including not voting at all) is inadvertently signalling that they are okay with the current situation, even if they say otherwise. >:(
in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

Yeah, but they get really bitchy when you (accurately) blame them for Trump being back in office.

If it weren't for the 7 million or so who stayed home or voted third party he'd be rotting in a jail cell today...

pardon my crudeness, but voting third party is like masturbating into a fan...It might feel good at the time, but it creates a huge mess that someone else is going to have to clean up.

reshared this

in reply to Democracy Dies in Dumbass

@ShredderFeeder

That number is over 15 million.

Way to Win has dug deeply into the cohort of nonvoters they've dubbed Biden Skippers, 2020 Biden voters who sat out 2024.

There are multiple episodes of their Charting The Way Forward podcast discussing their research, including surveys and focus groups, as well as conversations with folks like Terrance Woodbury, Cornell Belcher and Chuck Rocha.

Check them out at https://chartingthewayforward.buzzsprout.com/

@benroyce

in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

but maybe not for a platner or a fetterman? In the primaries, I mean.
This entry was edited (5 months ago)
in reply to John Mierau

right

and if people SHOWED THE FUCK UP in the #primaries that wouldn't be as big a problem

of course corporate centrists #democrats would still win some races

but less

then you *iterate*. you keep voting. you keep participating. you keep at it. it's not fucking hard!

then even less centrists win next round

if people SHOWED. THE. FUCK. UP.

instead of not showing up and whining the choices suck

no shit, and that's on *you*, nonvoter

#vote!

#primaries #primaries2026

This entry was edited (5 months ago)
in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

@john @ShredderFeeder Not everyone has the time to do that research. It ain't always easy. I'm regularly voting based on literally nothing more than a four year old interview on local radio from when the person was running for some different office. And for some races even that would be a lot of information. In at least one election all I could find to go on were photos of the candidate putting up yard signs! You only even get *claims* about what they want to accomplish at the highest level races, and even those require carefully watching their past history to know if they actually believe a single damn word of it. I struggle to figure this shit out and I'm invested enough to be taking classes on how to research candidates!

It'd be great if we had a party that actually held their candidates to some standard; an organization to do some of that vetting for us; instead of Ds and Rs that switch parties like an NFL draft without actually changing their positions...

Running under either party is basically just running with a corporate sponsor at this point. The only thing it proves is money and/or connections. And if you truly believe that people can all independently determine and vote for the best candidate then why does it matter which party? Why do we need parties at all? These organizations are either irrelevant or failures. Or they're highly successful as gatekeepers against us.

in reply to SlightlyCyberpunk

and none of that will ever change until we all participate

meanwhile making up endless excuses for why we won't participate by cynically positing these problems as insurmountable obstacles only means we're saying "i accept this"

of course we don't accept it

so we need to fucking participate!

and thereby change the system. which will not happen overnight. so we persist. resist. fight!

it is the only way

not voting is acceptance

#vote

#vote
This entry was edited (5 months ago)
in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

Voting for an organization that is trying to keep you out is acceptance.

Things will change when we participate in the work of actually organizing our communities and building institutions we can trust. The voting part matters but it's far from the most important thing. It won't do shit until we fix some of these other structural issues first.

"If voting changed anything they'd make it illegal"

This entry was edited (5 months ago)
in reply to SlightlyCyberpunk

bullshit

the democrats are not omnipotent space aliens

the democrats are who we fucking vote for

you're conceptualizing the issue all wrong, by positing the democrats as an unchangeable other. no. they are just me and you *if we show the fuck up and vote*

meanwhile, if you ignore your political process and only do community work and mutual aid, eventually MAGA just comes to machine gun you laughing

you have to work for better politically

you have to

This entry was edited (5 months ago)
in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

@john @ShredderFeeder The DNC is a large and wealthy institution with its own influences and agenda and which is not accountable to the voters. That is the problem we need to change. But you can't just vote that change into existance. That's not how the party is structured. It is not a democratic institution. It's not clear how we can actually make that change happen.

And sure, we can sometimes overwhelm that influence, but perhaps it would be easier if we weren't constantly fighting against these entrenched oligarchic systems.

The Democratic party knows that running independent is not a lost cause. They do it all the time when a progressive wins the primary. Now suddenly that progressive has all the baggage of their party, while the newly "independent" Democrat gets to pretend to be the outsider. They've proven they can win with that strategy. Why don't we use it too? Because they tell us it's impossible while they prove over and over again that it isn't. Because they tell us to "vote blue no matter who" while they fuck off and vote corporate no matter who. We need to stop pretending that those people represent our interests. We need to stop feeding their machine.

in reply to SlightlyCyberpunk

"But you can't just vote that change into existance."

motherfucker have you heard of a primary?

have you heard of mamdani?

fuck off with your weak cynical acceptance

your rationale is part of the problem of *why* the democratic party is the way it is. because you meekly accept, you don't fight it

fight!

This entry was edited (5 months ago)
in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

But when someone wins the primary who can't win the general, where do we end up?

Like it or not, the US is a two party system. The rules of the house, and the electoral college almost guarantee it. I'm all for changing those rules, but I don't see it happening any time soon.

290 to win is why we have a two party system. We'd be better off with a parliamentary system, but the founding fathers didn't see fit to make that a thing.

@admin@mastodon.slightlycyberpunk.com @john

in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

@john @ShredderFeeder Primaries do not determine the leadership of the party. The only people who get a vote on that are the existing leadership af the party. You do not have a vote there.
in reply to SlightlyCyberpunk

@admin @john @ShredderFeeder
Woah. I'm going to interject something here. Most of our government services are provided by local governments. Most of those elected positions are non-partisan. Vetting local candidates is easy, because they show up and knock on your door. They have door knock pieces that list their credentials and priorities. Once they have served in your city or county for a while, they may run for "higher" office. You know these people and can judge their character.
in reply to mizblueprint

@mizblueprint @john @ShredderFeeder I have literally never in my life had a candidate show up at my door. Although until last year I was in apartment complexes where they wouldn't be able to get in so that might be part of it. You'd occasionally find a stack of flyers stuffed into a crack by the buzzers or something but even that was usually just the larger races. In my experience, the more local the race, the harder it is to find anything beyond a list of candidates' names...

Then sometimes you'll find a link to the candidate's "official website" and get excited that you might be able to get at least a couple sentences about them only to discover that their "website" is an Instagram page that only has photos of them putting up yard signs...and even the signs don't even have as much as a slogan, just their name!

in reply to SlightlyCyberpunk

all you have are endless excuses not to participate

do you think the problem might be your rationale?

the world is not built to make your life easy

and you're built to fight for what is right

so fight, and stop complaining endlessly about everything

This entry was edited (5 months ago)
in reply to SlightlyCyberpunk

@admin @john @ShredderFeeder
I have knocked on tens of thousands of doors for my three terms, and as volunteer for other candidates. In every precinct in the city I served. Apartments, backyard or garage units, the only relevant data was whether or not they were voters. I always had a website and social media pages. Neighborhood coffees, candidate forums, interviews for endorsements, media interviews, unions, civic organizations. Public email address, council email & phone.
in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

Sadly, I will have to keep voting mainstream democrat instead or more to the left, in my local elections, if the apparently lefty candidates were not awful people. Like beat their kids awful. Because I want to have that option open to me and not have it derailed by people like that.

I kinda want to primary them.

This entry was edited (5 months ago)
in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

Yeah.

This was a municipal election between the so mainstream normal candidate that could be either a center left or center right depending on which way you squint and the very leftist one who has a horrible and public personal life.

I could not vote for the latter, as much as I wanted a decent person in that position to vote for. Nor could most residents.

This entry was edited (5 months ago)
in reply to Inky says "What the hell?!"

great

i'm certain this anecdote is meaningful for you

we're talking about the general usa

do you think this horrible candidate in your district says something in general?

of course it doesn't

This entry was edited (5 months ago)
in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

@john @ShredderFeeder Oh I agree but it is also worth considering that just because someone claims to be lefty does not mean just go on that. Do the research, if one can.
in reply to Inky says "What the hell?!"

@InkySchwartz @john @ShredderFeeder

oh of course

it's also invalid to speak against lefty candidates in general because you personally encountered a fake/ a douchebag purporting to be on the left. that's an anecdote, not evidence of anything more broadly

and i don't think you were trying to do that, but please scroll up and see how your response can seem to imply that. at the very least, define the specific context of your words and provide the caveat that you support the left, in general

in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

@ShredderFeeder

Asking for people to be better than the least of two evils is before voting for them is hardly demanding perfection. People need a system that allows them to vote for who they want not just who they don't want least.

Danny Boling ☮️ reshared this.

in reply to Richard W. Woodley ELBOWS UP 🇨🇦🌹🚴‍♂️📷 🗺️

absolutely true

and you get that with participation

you're not dealing with people making coherent demands before they participate

you're dealing with lazy entitled wankers making excuses not to participate

you give them what they want?

they just make up new excuses not to vote

that is who we are dealing with. *that* is the problem

you can't respect this, it's impossible

you smack these people upside the forehead and demand they wake the fuck up

This entry was edited (5 months ago)

Neil E. Hodges reshared this.

in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

@the5thColumnist @ShredderFeeder The worst part is, there's no reason to allow extreme cynicism about the electoral system (which I share!) to become an excuse for non-participation, let alone a reason to deride others for refusing to give up on it.

I personally know hardcore anarchists who would prefer, ultimately, to see the entire apparatus of the state dismantled. Yet they still bloody vote, if only out of spite towards the most right-wing candidate. 😆

in reply to Richard W. Woodley ELBOWS UP 🇨🇦🌹🚴‍♂️📷 🗺️

Relevant. We won't get a new system if we continue to allow the current system to thrive. :/


Anyone saying that they won't vote for people opposing this (including not voting at all) is inadvertently signalling that they are okay with the current situation, even if they say otherwise. >:(

in reply to Neil E. Hodges

@tk @ShredderFeeder @the5thColumnist

exactly!

does the #usa voting system suck?

absolutely

so what do you do?

some of you don't #vote

then what happens

obviously, it gets worse

🤦 🤦 🤦

but if you hold your nose and participate, it will still suck...

but a little less

then you iterate. and it sucks even less next round

that's how you do it!

meanwhile, what does whining and sitting things out achieve, genius nonvoters?

HELLO?

#vote motherfuckers

reshared this

in reply to I_give_u_worms

well then pack your bags for the concentration camps

because if you never fight, it's endless MAGA fascism

i agree plodding incremental strategy is dreary and boring

and we need a left candidate with fire in their belly to appeal emotionally

this isn't a problem. that's human nature. there's no denying it

but you have to understand:

we're talking about assholes who don't even show up in the primaries to get those real left candidates!

This entry was edited (5 months ago)

reshared this

in reply to I_give_u_worms

@i_give_u_worms Is it?
Did she clearly lay out the negative ramifications of sitting out the election?
Did she own up to not being perfect, but inarguably a long way better than the adjudicated rapist, especially for people of color?
Did her campaign employ effective communication methods and channels to get her message to people she really needed to hear it?
Did her campaign leverage highly effective ads produced by progressive groups?
...
@tk @ShredderFeeder @the5thColumnist
in reply to Grassroots Joe

@i_give_u_worms
No, no, no, and no.
Especially the last one. Amplify Freedom, a construct of the Freedom Over Fascism Movement Briefing consortium, produced great ads addressing attacks on immigrants, LGBTQ+ people in general, trans people in particular.
Harris' campaign didn't appear to know they existed much less put $ behind them.

If they had Bob Casey, maybe Sherrod Brown would still be Senators, possibly a sane person in the White House.

@benroyce @tk @ShredderFeeder @the5thColumnist

in reply to Neil E. Hodges

@tk Disagree. We need incremental change. But if you always vote for the "left-most" viable candidate in every election, eventually we'll get there.

Radical change or "tear it all down" gets people killed, plain and simple..

@the5thColumnist @benroyce

in reply to Richard W. Woodley ELBOWS UP 🇨🇦🌹🚴‍♂️📷 🗺️

@the5thColumnist Wow, that sounds like people who regularly sit out municipal elections, where people you want are rarely if ever on the ballot. Those rare times you do find someone you want invariably end in disappointment because they *never* live up to your expectations. You vote for the least worst option anyway, otherwise you are letting a shockingly small number of people do it for you.

Choosing not to vote is a de facto vote.

@benroyce @ShredderFeeder

in reply to Deb Nam-Krane

@dnkboston @the5thColumnist @ShredderFeeder

"none of the above" should be an option on every ballot, and if None wins, the election must be held again, without the rejected candidates.

hell, even I'd vote.

in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

@dnkboston @the5thColumnist @ShredderFeeder

once again, for the people not paying attention -

i just spent 3 weeks at the ICE detention center, 24/7, being gassed and harassed, while you sat on your lazy ass at home.

i didn't get enough to eat most of that time.

i did this to stand up to fascists. as i have done my entire life.

in reply to roblosricos

If you voted, you fucking moron, you wouldn't have to do that

Unfollow me at least, a block is preferable

This entry was edited (5 months ago)
in reply to roblosricos

@roblosricos @dnkboston @the5thColumnist @ShredderFeeder

Well yes the point is to vote and keep fascism out

What's failing us are the morons not voting and doing call of duty edgelord fantasy life of revolution. Having not the slightest fucking clue what that is really like. They are either violent idiots or agent provocateurs out to sabotage the left

in reply to GJ Groothedde 🇪🇺

i never block

(except those creeps that follow you around to harass you)

when i see posting behavior a normal person would just block, i mock them with an eye on getting them to block me- that's enjoyable. or such that i harvest enough of their behavior to get a server suspend, then i report them (behavior way over the line, like vatnik trolls with their kremlin disinfo, assorted racists, transphobes, etc)

This entry was edited (4 months ago)
in reply to Deb Nam-Krane

@dnkboston
I am, in fact, not registered at all. I'm a Dutch national currently living in France and I never claimed American citizenship in spite of insistent urging on behalf of my Californian ex. 😂
@benroyce @roblosricos @the5thColumnist @ShredderFeeder
in reply to GJ Groothedde 🇪🇺

i get tons of blocks

i consider it a win considering the kind of people doing the blocking

everyone from polite society, who don't like my attitude. i view them with contempt, because polite society is happy to tolerate bigotry as long as its serene. they view someone angry as a problem. anger is what is really appropriate

to the entitled nonvoting shitbags themselves who are enraged i call out their self-serving bullshit

This entry was edited (4 months ago)
in reply to GJ Groothedde 🇪🇺

@Eetschrijver @dnkboston @roblosricos @the5thColumnist @ShredderFeeder That marsupial blocked me after I dared to question his assertion that the only solution to politics in the USA was to “buy guns” and not vote.

I actually got a MASSIVE amount of blocks on that topic. It turns out that America has a serious mental disease where they love guns more than anything else. And it’s not just right-wingers. Or maybe all those “anarchists” are actually just libertarians with hammer and sickle avatars.

in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

@roblosricos @dnkboston @the5thColumnist @ShredderFeeder

So one point about that: If you want people to vote, you have make it:

A) Worth the effort (ie: votes actually mattering)

and

B) Not make their life a living hell.

Hint: Ask a "potential swing voter" in a "swing state" how the last year before election feels.

Danny Boling ☮️ reshared this.

in reply to Poul-Henning Kamp

why are we catering to people who don't care enough to understand the stakes to their own lives

in which case we're dealing with a moron, no brain (i'm not talking genius levels of political insight, but really obvious choices)

or people entitled and privileged enough that they don't care to do anything but whine

in which case we're dealing with an asshole, no heart

what do you think is actually served by such an approach?

This entry was edited (4 months ago)
in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

@roblosricos @dnkboston @the5thColumnist @ShredderFeeder

First, I'm Danish, so I have grown up in country where 83 to 87% vote for parliament.

Second: Have you actually ever asked a friend, who is a "swing voter" in a "swing state", how many times they get accosted because of that designation and how much that can make life hell, almost constantly ?

Because if the insane voting system in USA, there is an enormous pressure on those "pivot voters", while much of the rest of the voters know that there is absolutely zero chance of their vote changing anything, because of where they live.

And the other part of it is that you dont have two-party system. You have a one-party system which cos-plays as a two-part system, and the voters are plenty smart to see right through that.

If you want to get people to vote, you have to change both of those aspects: Make all votes matter and give the voters a real choice.

in reply to Poul-Henning Kamp

@phloggen @roblosricos @dnkboston @the5thColumnist @ShredderFeeder

"You have a one-party system which cos-plays as a two-part system"

ah, "BoTh SiDeS tHe SaMe"

Poul: that is an incredibly fucking stupid lie

you're danish?

would harris be making claims on greenland?

be honest

does it matter?

of course

so right there is something huge and concrete for your own concerns, nevermind domestic issues

so stop fucking lying Poul, and doing apologia for morons who believe really stupid lies

in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

yelling at assholes buried in mindless lying cynicism, me, is not the problem

the entitled assholes buried in mindless lying cynicism is the problem

i say entitled because they are privileged enough to not care if trump wins, that it doesn't affect them

or they are that fucking stupid to believe it won't affect them

there is a difference that matters

not big enough?

some stupid fuck thinks they are going to get perfect?

This entry was edited (4 months ago)
in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

@roblosricos @dnkboston @the5thColumnist @ShredderFeeder

It's really very simple:

No matter which party you vote for, the 1%'ers get richer and everybody else gets poorer.

All the rest is just play-acting and rearranging the deckchairs as far as I am concerned.

And really, Greenland ?

You know what that is about ?

Area(USA) + Area(Greenland) > Area(Canada)

Area(USA) + Area(Canada) > Area(Russia)

Yes, an orange man with a very small and predictable brain.

in reply to Poul-Henning Kamp

@phloggen @roblosricos @dnkboston @the5thColumnist @ShredderFeeder

this is the rationale of the 1/3 in the usa that do not vote

another 1/3 is fascist and the final is sane

if the 1/3 who don't vote because "life sucks waaah" fucking voted, maybe we could do something about our problem

your entire rationale is cynicism

you realize cynicism is acceptance right?

do you like plutocracy?

no?

then why are you accepting it

that *is* what you're doing with your rationale

in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

and yes to your observation about greenland poul

and???

do we accept it?

or do we make pessimistic posts and leave it at that? what is the fucking point of that?

besides, again, cynicism

which is what again poul?

that's right: acceptance

cynicism is acceptance

do you accept this bs?

no?

then you tell people to fucking #vote

right?

#vote
This entry was edited (4 months ago)
in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

@roblosricos @dnkboston @the5thColumnist @ShredderFeeder

And you seem to have missed the important bit about me be Danish:

Never mind the effect of it, I dont even get a vote, but I have to live with the shitty consequences of what has gone on in your dysfunctional country for my entire life.

I'm Danish and yet my first memory of non-children television was the Vietnam war, and it has gone downhill from there.

So I have every right to be cynical, and to call your sorry excuse for a democracy a one-party system cosplaying as a two-party system.

in reply to Poul-Henning Kamp

@phloggen @roblosricos @dnkboston @the5thColumnist @ShredderFeeder

then stop lecturing americans trying to fix things on the premise of your broken useless cynicism and your ignorance about how the stupid american voting system works

you're not helping

go get drunk and call americans assholes. we are

but don't think for a second anything you are writing here is going to fix the problem. since you're cynical, you don't even care about that, all you want to do is whine

in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

@roblosricos @dnkboston @the5thColumnist @ShredderFeeder

Said Every EU person to visit USA: "That could be such a wonderful place, if only they got their shit together for just one week!"

But if you think voting is going to get USA out of the mess, you are almost certainly wrong, and if you think voting for one of the existing parties will do it, you are very very wrong.

There are three ways USA can get out of the current mess and there's no telling how long that will take:

1. Military Coup. That is, after all, very much "The American Way". Probably not happening, too many fascists in uniform, but strictly speaking the have sworn to do so, in a situation like now.

2. Somebody untainted by current politics and widely known and trustworthy runs for a new third party. This is the Havel/Wałęsa/Zelensky model. Colbert can probably pull it off.

3. California leaves, USA. They're big enough. Some NE states may join Canada. The technical term is "civil war.

in reply to Poul-Henning Kamp

you know poul, i've been treating you with kid gloves

gloves off

you sit there, happily posting from denmark, dictating to americans boring mediocre cynicism and

1. not to vote and do a fucking *coup*(!?)

3. do 3rd party (doesn't work in an fptp voting system, but you're ignorant)

4. dissolution of the usa(!?)

poul:

do me a favor and never speak of american politics again

you are an idiot

please stop following me

This entry was edited (4 months ago)
in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

@roblosricos @dnkboston @the5thColumnist @ShredderFeeder

1. By all means vote, but never vote against your own interests, which means dont vote for the 1%'ers sock-puppets, no matter what they call their party.

2. I can count.

3. You do know that the current two parties in USA are not the same as the first two parties in USA, right ? Even in a shitty system like yours, change can happen.

4. »When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another[…]«

It doesn't say "single use only"

in reply to Poul-Henning Kamp

@phloggen @roblosricos @dnkboston @the5thColumnist @ShredderFeeder

obviously there are fascists as a problem

but then there is also this lumpenproletariat like poul regurgitating easy lazy cynicism and thinking "i'm helping!"

you're sitting in denmark lecturing americans to dissolve the country, have a fucking coup, or do 3rd party in an fptp voting system

*all of that only helps the fascists, genius*

you lack the care or intelligence to see how

stop talking about what you don't understand

in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

@roblosricos @dnkboston @the5thColumnist @ShredderFeeder

Ben, there is this thing called "perspective", and one of the ways you can get one, is by being an observant outsider.

There is also "lack of perspective" which often happens to people so deeply on the inside, that they no longer think an outside exists or matters.

I do think I have some perspective, I have lived in USA, my kids have USAnian mother and are dual citizens, and I have been forced to powerlessly observe USA closely for all my life.

You on the other hand lack perspective, so much so, that you cannot even imagine a third party existing, much less that USA could ever reconfigure, and you curse the voters, many of which saw clearer than you, that voting for either party would not improve things for them.

But I understand why you're upset, but anger wont win you a "Velvet Revolution".

And since I'm quite sure you have no idea what that is: Look it up, it's USA's best chance.

in reply to Poul-Henning Kamp

you want us to have a coup, to dissolve the country, or vote 3rd party in an fptp voting system which helps maga win

i instantly lost all respect for you for posting that

you don't have perspective

you're an idiot

don't worry about my request to you to unfollow me, i forced you to unfollow me already

This entry was edited (4 months ago)
in reply to Poul-Henning Kamp

@phloggen I don't have words for how bad the idea of secession is. As a wiser woman than I noted, the federal government would just let us keep valuable property like the kind that exists in NY, CA, and the other blue states? No. @benroyce @roblosricos @the5thColumnist @ShredderFeeder
in reply to Poul-Henning Kamp

@phloggen @dnkboston @roblosricos @the5thColumnist @ShredderFeeder

and at the same time, you're proposing a coup or a dissolution of the usa

pick a lane, deep thinker

do you want us murdering each other in the streets yes or no?

because you're in another comment saying you're looking forward to it

this is how i lost all respect for you

in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

@phloggen @dnkboston @roblosricos @the5thColumnist @ShredderFeeder

Another outside perspective.

It's american exceptionalism again. Somehow the US threat to democracy is completely unique, never happened before or elsewhere. Nope. It is uniquely bad, and impossible to solve politically, by voting. Nope, it's a one way fast lane to hell (or cosplaying armed revolution heaven) and we better give up beforehand.

in reply to Annavirrpanna

@phloggen @dnkboston @roblosricos @the5thColumnist @ShredderFeeder

Also also... WTF people, you do know that people dies for the right to vote, Have died. But you can't stand the indignity of voting for someone far from ideal. Perspective please!

As a last resort: PLEASE vote for the lesser evil for us poor bastards in the rest of the world. We have to live with your choice, or your laziness.

in reply to Annavirrpanna

@annavirrpanna @lmgenealogy @phloggen @dnkboston @roblosricos @the5thColumnist @ShredderFeeder

some nonvoters are just that stupid

some of these anti-voting accounts you see are fake accounts, doing a purposeful troll farm psyop to achieve the intended effect: weaken the left turnout to help trump

and then some of them are victims of said psyop, thinking they are doing something "principled" because they fell for the lying manipulative bullshit

in reply to Annavirrpanna

@annavirrpanna @phloggen @dnkboston @the5thColumnist @ShredderFeeder

democracy works by ALWAYS creating a minority to oppress. and that's what you vote for, every time.

like: "they're killing protesters!"

voters: "that has to stop!"

later: "they're killing homeless people!"

voters: "they are following the (anti-homeless) laws."

in reply to roblosricos

just wait until rob figures out how other forms of government work

rob the political science professor is in for an exciting voyage of discovery about oppression in non-democratic societies

would you like to tell us how homelessness is handled in authoritarian societies rob? go ahead, scholar rob, educate us fools

This entry was edited (4 months ago)
in reply to roblosricos

rob, no one has a problem with your words because you are experiencing homelessness. i am sorry that you're homeless

the point is homelessness is not unique to democracy. homelessness sucks everywhere. in russia you can be shipped off to murder/ be murdered in ukraine. in china if you are not in the hukou system you're persona non grata for social services. other countries have it better, some worse than the usa

This entry was edited (4 months ago)
in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

I've been homeless in the past... I've been VERY homeless....

Sometimes the only fix for homelessness is taking all your anger and putting it into not being homeless anymore...

When Rob masters channeling his anger into something useful instead of being pissed off on social media, well then he might stand a chance...

But since vivaldi.net is defederated on my server, he's not going to see this message...

@roblosricos@vivaldi.net @annavirrpanna @phloggen @dnkboston @the5thColumnist

in reply to Democracy Dies in Dumbass

@ShredderFeeder @annavirrpanna @phloggen @dnkboston @the5thColumnist

rob is entitled to any opinion he wants

i will meet him at his opinion

if his opinion is related to homelessness i will defer to his lived experience and not be so arrogant as to assume my opinion has more value than his. but if his opinion is not on homelessness, but on comparative social safety nets in other countries, my knowledge is as good as his. unless rob has experience being homeless in other countries. do you rob?

in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

@ShredderFeeder @annavirrpanna @phloggen @dnkboston @the5thColumnist

i don't give a fuck about social safety nets in other countries. how does that affect me in the slightest?

last saturday, the police took everything from me. i didn't even have a sleeping bag to curl up in, and couldn't replace mine for three days.

so forgive me if i'm feeling especially bitter and hate-filled at the moment.

in reply to Poul-Henning Kamp

@phloggen
Yes to the orange Shitgibbon it was about growing the US, but that does not answer the core question @benroyce was asking: Would Harris have done that or even said she wanted to do that?

It might not be much, but it is a difference between the 'two parties'. But that too misses the point, if the mentally deficients had voted, perhaps we would have had Harris or even a third party president...
1/2

@roblosricos @dnkboston @the5thColumnist @ShredderFeeder

in reply to James Wells

@phloggen
Remember, roughly 40% of eligible voters chose not to vote, that means that the rest of the candidates combined had 60%, of which Chump got 49%... AKA roughly 30% of eligible voters, meaning those 40% could have elected whoever the hell they wanted and in their stupidity chose to stay home.

@benroyce @roblosricos @dnkboston @the5thColumnist @ShredderFeeder

in reply to James Wells

I still wonder how much is being purged in favor of one party or another even more than how many isn't voting. I put the blame on THAT
This entry was edited (4 months ago)
in reply to Just Bob

@justbob
That is an important question, but also kind of a trick. The 40% that chose not to vote were people who were eligible to vote meaning they were not purged and were instead qualified to vote.

We don't know, or at least I am not aware of it, how many people were purged and not allowed to vote or how many votes were discarded for insufficiency. But again, that 40% does not include those people.

@phloggen @benroyce @roblosricos @dnkboston @the5thColumnist @ShredderFeeder

in reply to James Wells

With all of them demanding ID and places sweeping #homeless people as well as stealing their ID, 771,000 people often CAN'T even vote. Just to add to the nonsense... I've been out for 14 years and have given up on even having papers even though I'm qualified to vote.

@nikatjef @phloggen @benroyce @roblosricos @dnkboston @the5thColumnist @ShredderFeeder

in reply to Just Bob

meaning what for those who still can vote?

all the more reason we must show up

to even begin to approach a position where we can fix that

This entry was edited (4 months ago)
in reply to James Wells

@nikatjef @roblosricos @dnkboston @the5thColumnist @ShredderFeeder

Cursing the people who probably most desire change, for not voting in an election that would not give them any, does not make any sense.

USA needs a 3rd party which is not beholden to the 1%'ers.

Create that, and will guarantee you the 40% will come running to vote for it.

in reply to Poul-Henning Kamp

@phloggen @nikatjef @roblosricos @dnkboston @the5thColumnist @ShredderFeeder

so you're depending upon people who can't reason their way out of a wet paper back, and elicit an amount of care akin to spitting on the street, and you think great passion is what motivates them?

nevermind you have NO FUCKING CLUE how our shitty fptp voting system works, but still think you have a right to comment on what you don't understand

in reply to Poul-Henning Kamp

@phloggen
A very little known fact about the US party system: it is not set in stone. To create a new party simply requires starting one. And to get federal funding / support merely requires 6% voter turn-out. The US actually has more than 10 parties on the books. The libertarian party and the communist party are two of the biggest, but they tend to be a bit disorganized and fail to register their candidates properly.

@benroyce @roblosricos @dnkboston @the5thColumnist @ShredderFeeder

in reply to James Wells

@nikatjef @phloggen @roblosricos @dnkboston @the5thColumnist @ShredderFeeder 1/2
How is a 3rd party going to change anything. 1group is solid, 1group is following tradition, 1group is saying they don't care. So you have divided the ones that should be supporting what is Left in half. In this case they fucked themselves. As I've said before Biden/Harris was trying to give them what I hear many on that left want, medical, global warming a chance for a future.
in reply to A_Minion

@A_Minion @nikatjef @phloggen @roblosricos @dnkboston @the5thColumnist @ShredderFeeder

a lot of people proclaiming "3rd party" are elsewhere in the world like europe with zero clue how fucked the american fptp voting system is

they are lecturing from a position of ignorance

you are correct:

3rd part only divides one side and the other side wins

in our fucked up system

until we can change the voting system to get stable viable 3rd parties, the only way forward is to take over the democrats

in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

@A_Minion @nikatjef @roblosricos @dnkboston @the5thColumnist @ShredderFeeder

And yet, fucked up as it is, a 3rd party getting to power has already happened once.

Have you already forgotten, or did you never learn about "The whig party" ?

Almost 10% of your presidents came from that party.

So instead of saying a 3rd party is impossible, stop your whining and get of your lazy butt and start one!

in reply to Poul-Henning Kamp

the whigs are from the 1840s you colossal dimwit

a better example:

ross perot, who divided the right and handed bill clinton a win in 1992

or all the morons who voted for nader in florida, throwing the vote under the microscope because it was so close, handing gw bush the supreme court aided "win" in 2000

*that is all 3rd party is good for in the usa currently*

learn it

or stop fucking talking ignorance

This entry was edited (4 months ago)
in reply to Poul-Henning Kamp

the hardest part about getting a 3rd party traction is that the current system is directly controlled by the RNC and DNC. They are the ones who run the debates. They will just choose to never include a third party. They also have the power to buy every single ad slot available to ensure no third party candidate will ever get space to advertise their campaign. It's pretty scary.

Also most Americans don't even realize that the two parties are literally private corporations, not public institutions.

in reply to feld

@feld @dnkboston @nikatjef @A_Minion @the5thColumnist @ShredderFeeder @roblosricos

It will absolutely be an uphill battle, and if history (of other countries!) is anything to go by, you need a political outsider with high name-recognition to pull it off.

About the only place to find that kind of name-recognition these days is entertainment, (see also: Zelensky) which I why I think Colbert is somebody who might be able to do it.

in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

@dnkboston @nikatjef @A_Minion @the5thColumnist @ShredderFeeder @roblosricos

Duverger's law only says that two parties tend to dominate, it does not say anything about what the elections outside "tend to" look like, nor that it will be the same two parties forever.

And as I already pointed out: Happened more than once in USAs history already, using the precisely same flawed rules of election.

in reply to Poul-Henning Kamp

@phloggen @dnkboston @nikatjef @A_Minion @the5thColumnist @ShredderFeeder @roblosricos

it happened in the 1840s, and then there was a civil war

that doesn't tell us a fucking thing about the modern day

what does?

ross perot in 1992

ralph nader in 2000

you are idiot or a liar purposefully trying to help fascism

in reply to Poul-Henning Kamp

thank you, random guy in denmark who doesn't know his ass from his elbow, for your critique on voting in the usa which only serves to support maga, because you're too stupid to understand that is all that you are achieving, regardless of your intent
This entry was edited (4 months ago)
in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

You know what the true hallmark of fascim is ?

"Either you're with me or you're against me - no room for nuance!"

This entry was edited (4 months ago)
in reply to Poul-Henning Kamp

@phloggen @dnkboston @nikatjef @A_Minion @the5thColumnist @ShredderFeeder @roblosricos

it's called reality Poul

there's also people who think vaccines harm more than disease, and that climate change isn't real

you don't respect that

in exactly the same way you don't respect idiots who don't understand what duverger's law means

rejecting stupidity and lies is not fascism

in reply to A_Minion

@A_Minion

Works well with ranked preference voting, single transferable vote or something more proportional.

Given three party candidates, rank them in order:-

Unlikely to be elected but virtuous
May be elected, somewhat virtuous
Might be elected, ghastly without virtue.

So you might be surprised by your first choice being elected, but you are no less likely to have your second choice elected.

in reply to MidgePhoto

@Photo55 @A_Minion

right but to get that change people need to show up and vote and participate

instead they vote 3rd party *before* we get the voting system change, helping MAGA

or they use our broken system as an excuse not to vote, which, again, helps MAGA win

in reply to Poul-Henning Kamp

@phloggen @nikatjef @roblosricos @dnkboston @the5thColumnist @ShredderFeeder I hate to tell you this, but you don’t understand the first thing about US politics.

Thanks for the tips and advice (aka pipe dreams and vapid platitudes) but they are worthless since you can’t comprehend even the basics of our system.

PS - We had a well-funded 3rd candidate in 1992 and it only increased voter turnout by 5% from the previous election.

PPS - You’re claiming that people who most desire change don’t vote? IMO they must not desire it very much if they won’t even get off their couch. Like, if you REALLY desire change and your answer is to sit around and whine instead of AT LEAST voting? Nah you just don’t give a 💩.

in reply to SouprMatt

@mls14 @phloggen @nikatjef @roblosricos @dnkboston @the5thColumnist @ShredderFeeder Yeah. Never thought I would use the term “ keyboard warriors” myself, but sadly we have them here on Mastodon.

People who demand things and insist upon things, but support nothing and no one and do nothing themselves.

Push back against this wherever you see it, it helps Mastodon (and the real world)

in reply to Poul-Henning Kamp

@phloggen @nikatjef @roblosricos @dnkboston @the5thColumnist @ShredderFeeder

We have this in Germany, and yet the opposite is true. The stupidity of non-voters and voters is even greater than that of politicians. And sometimes you wonder if democracy isn't abolishing itself precisely because of this stupidity?!
🤔

in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

@phloggen @nikatjef @roblosricos @dnkboston @the5thColumnist @ShredderFeeder

Seit #AFD, #BSW und dieser #Union, keine Ahnung mehr, Ben.

Hinzukommt dass die Demokraten es sich dann durch schräge Bündnisse - vor denen etliche warnen - trotzdem eingehen.

Hinzukommt dass die Medien und deren Populisten einen gewaltigen Einfluss haben und die Menschen lieber solchen Marktschreiern zuhören. Wenn die Bildung völlig im Arsch ist auch irgendwie kein Wunder mehr.

in reply to Democracy Dies in Dumbass

from shredderfood.com?

i forced their account to unfollow me

or maybe there is a delay here

This entry was edited (5 months ago)
in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

100% agreed. The non voters and democrates aiming for the (none-existant) 100% candidate are worse than any maga andf caused this nightmare.
in reply to Luupies

and so, due to people thinking like you en masse, the chance of a #UBI gets even more remote

but if you participate, and iterate, you slowly inch your way towards the possibility

your rationale *guarantees* there will never be a UBI

the only way you get a UBI is to participate

if you withhold your participation until you get what you want, right now, rather than slow plodding boring iterative progress, you only make sure the chance of a UBI is zero

not voting *never* works

#VOTE!

#vote #ubi
This entry was edited (5 months ago)
in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

respectfully, I don't believe "left wing" politicians will do anything like UBI (that reduces their opportunities for corruption) unless forced to. The same kind even stopped >>>>NIXON<<<< from passing one. Only a foot on the neck of their careers will change that.
in reply to Luupies

When I met with a local socialist group, they brought up how the Democratic Party politicians used to be pro-labor, etc., but that changed in the 70s to what we have today: corporation bootlickers. :(
in reply to Neil E. Hodges

@tk Indeed, just look at the dem nomination ceremonies, with all VIP lodges filled with multinationals. I believe UBI gives a lot of negotiation powers to workers because they won't starve if they lose their job.
in reply to Luupies

so you vote to change that

you participate

you don't sit there and whine about corporatist democrats being omnipotent. they are in fact extremely weak now

are you an eternal victim? do you cynically believe nothing ever changes?

no

just say what you want, and fucking vote for it

you participate

nothing will change until you do, and if you endlessly make up weak excuses for why "everything sucks and then you die, waah" *you* are the one making sure that is so with your rationale

This entry was edited (5 months ago)
in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

I believe a perfectly simple contract is how to get there: UBI or BUST.
Your position makes sense but I have been following politics, notably US politics for decades, and that's where that conclusion comes from
in reply to Luupies

i agree with you 100%

the problem is *how*

and the solution is participation, relentlessly

and our enemy is plutocrats and bigots, of course

but it's also these lazy entitled assholes who go

"but it's not faiiiir... but it's haaaard... waaaah... i'm not voting, we should just get what we want right now with no effort"

man, fuck these uesless fucking lumps. sometimes i think they are our greater enemy than MAGA

This entry was edited (5 months ago)
in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

I believe you want progress too but also believe there's only one way to get there and it's having them "pay" for our vote... it's our only commodity.
in reply to Luupies

yes, and you do that in the primaries

not in the general election when the alternative is MAGA

there's a time to make demands, and a time to strategize

then iterate and ratchet towards better

but some people make demands when the negotiations are over (the primaries are the negotiation, you're showing up in them, those who are reading along here, right?)

and some don't ever do any shit at all except whine

This entry was edited (5 months ago)
in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

@luupies there is no better, there is only prolonging the worse. let's be honest here. the options are bad now and bad later. You support bad later over bad now, sure, fine, why not, but let's not pretend the end result isn't still towards eventual bad.
in reply to SSFC KDT 💚💙⚽🌹💻🍺✌

but this observation can apply to any political process in any country real or imagined, in all of history and forever more

so you're just voicing mindless cynicism, not reality

of course you can have better

*if you work for it*

*and persist*

instead of making excuses to accept bad as you are doing

those who intend malice *love* your rationale

so don't give that rationale to them, serving them

you are accepting their abuse with your rationale

cynicism is acceptance

This entry was edited (5 months ago)
in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

The more you just let them have without a fight, the more they will take.
Either resist, or bend over and kiss your ass goodbye, because sooner or later they will come for you if you do nothing to stop them.
in reply to Seán Fenian

@zakalwe @ssfckdt what do you mean by "fighting"? I don't like violence and don't either think that constantly voting, for the same people, on the same platforms should be called fighting.
in reply to Luupies

Support candidates whose platform you mostly like, when you have the opportunity to choose candidates. Make sure your party's candidates know that your support for their office is contingent upon their good behavior. Try to oppose the worst of the worst. This really isn't a difficult concept.
in reply to Seán Fenian

@zakalwe @ssfckdt the theory is concise and simple... but decades of poor results tell us that that theory doesn't suffice. If we all went UBI or BUST, you'd immediately get results
in reply to Luupies

@luupies @zakalwe @ssfckdt

but you won't ever get that until you show the fuck up and persist

then you get UBI

"UBI or bust" then not voting until you get that, just means you'll never get UBI

in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

to be clear, I'm not from the US so I'm not facing MAGA (eew)... still, it's kind of a feature of all elections that the other side is absolutely the culmination of evil and so we vote and we continue down the same path and the US two party system makes that even worse
in reply to Luupies

@luupies Same, I'm not from the US and don't live there either. One of the changes they desperately need to agitate for is a change to FPTP (the same change is needed in the UK) - more coalitions, more compromise, more of these fuckers actually talking to each other and hammering out a plan that fucks over as few of their own small voter bases as possible, gets a more progressive and fair society.
in reply to Brad Macpherson

@brad @luupies

i agree with both of you but we're never going to get any of those changes until people show the fuck up and vote

that is the root problem we can work on

participation will change things

nonparticipation is just whiners accepting the abuse

in reply to Brad Macpherson

We are very, very, very slowly making inroads with ranked choice voting.

The establishment is fighting it tooth and nail because they know it means the end of their stranglehold on power.

Footnote:
I came up with a way to implement proportional representation on top of the basic existing US electoral system. People would SCREAM BLOODY MURDER, but it would work.

This entry was edited (5 months ago)
in reply to Luupies

@luupies When a right wing g party wins, that doesn't make the other party think "we weren't left enough," it makes them think "we need to move right." You want a left party? Vote for whoever is more to the left, e en if they aren't as left as you. If they win, other candidates will think "left ideas are safe now" and you'll see more left ideas. Look at AOC and "the squad" for examples.
in reply to Jimmy

@jhavok I do not agree to that. I have ZERO interest on who is most to the left and do not care about Bimbo Guevarra. My aim is not to maximize how much politicians have of tax money to play with... it's about an ACTUAL safety net for EVERYBODY (and the myryiad benefits of that)... not people deemed politically astute to redirect money towards by a corrupt, self-serving class of politicians
in reply to Luupies

"B*mb* G**v*rr*"

are you fucking serious?

fuck you you fucking shitbag

please unfollow me

This entry was edited (5 months ago)
in reply to Jimmy

@jhavok Bimbo Guevarra has a new ensemble to show you on instagram while talking of the revolution!!!
in reply to Jimmy

@jhavok ah, here comes the "he's a racist, he's a mysogynist"... did I forget something?
in reply to Luupies

yes, you deserve the insults, because you deployed a misogynistic slur

welcome to grown up life, child:

show respect, get respect

be a disrespectful turd, talk to the hand

capisce, asswipe?

This entry was edited (5 months ago)
in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

@jhavok that's stupid. Insulting aoc is not the same as insulting all women. And the fact you can't see that is very concerning
in reply to Luupies

@luupies @jhavok

it says you still follow me

but there is a delay in the ui

did you stop following me?

please do so

or block me, even better

FUCK OFF

in reply to Jimmy

@jhavok @luupies

i've met this guy in youtube comments. they think they're so edgy. just an immature disrespectful loser

in reply to Jimmy

@jhavok are you actually crying? Did it hurt you soooo much?
in reply to Luupies

@luupies @jhavok

yes, we're crying

that's what we're doing, yup

hey friend: did you ever notice how the emotionally immature project their own frustrations and difficulties in life in their lame edgelord shtick? you can read them like a book like that

anyways, stop using misogynistic slurs, fuckstick

in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

@jhavok stop talking of immature and projecting frustrations... you're the one that started insulting and went on posts after posts. Get a fucking mirror and take a good look at yourself... and then change your bio because you're the opposite of that.
And there's nothing mysoginistic at calling aoc Bimbo Guevarra.

Saying "women are inferior, belong in the kitchen", and such is mysoginistic. Calling ONE woman a Bimbo is NOT.

in reply to Luupies

@luupies @jhavok

unread

uninterested

i asked you to stop following me

do so or block me, or the next response from you gets a block from me

in reply to Luupies

block it is then, misogynistic asswipe
This entry was edited (5 months ago)
in reply to Jimmy

@jhavok @luupies@mastodon.social @benroyce That is useful advice, but it really doesn't apply when the candidate in question isn't meaningfully "left". Voting for a conservative who wants you destitute, disempowered, and dead isn't a meaningful improvement over voting for a fasicst. AOC and Mamdani are, in the context of #USpol, two of the only true leftist candidates.

The problem we have is that centrist and conservative DINOs have no interest in acceeding to even the most minor policy demands of the left.

This entry was edited (5 months ago)
in reply to Gemma Seymour

@gcvrsa What a vivid imagination. Facts:
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/people-in-republican-counties-have-higher-death-rates-than-those-in-democratic-counties/

One candidate belongs to a death cult, the other candidate just wants society to function. Some people don't see the difference.

in reply to Jimmy

@gcvrsa The way to move politics to the left is to vote in primaries. One of the nastiest DINOs in DC is there because Republicans cross lines in the primary (Ed Case) and it's difficult to get enough turnout to send him packing.
in reply to Jimmy

yup

AOC and Mamdani are there because people voted in the primaries

and this generalized whining like Gemma's about "not left enough" is used as an (invalid) rationale to not vote, which means we won't get any more AOCs and Mamdanis

the democrats sucking is a problem, yes

but people not voting is the bigger problem, and part of the *cause* of the democrats sucking

This entry was edited (5 months ago)
in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

@gcvrsa Democrats not sucking is why the super-lefties hate them and try to kneecap them. Can't smash the state when it's functioning.
in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

"BoTh SiDeS tHe SaMe" is a vote for shit to KEEP GETTING WORSE because nobody's ever going to be good enough for you. If you didn't vote in the last election because Harris wasn't perfect, you voted for Trump. This is on you.

reshared this

in reply to Seán Fenian

@zakalwe
Democratic mayors deployment of armed police against unarmed homeless civilians is NO DIFFERENT
---
The Silence Continues (Just Bob 538 @ https://venmo.com/code?user_id=3063551149211648869)

The silence is deafening. Always hearing about this country or that one, this group or that one but the silence continues for #homeless people.

(Amendment I) Sorry, you don't have the right to assemble in public space even in protest because your homeless.

(Amendment IV) Sorry, you don't have the right to be served a search warrant when we steal your only way to stay warm and dry.

(Amendment VIII) Sorry, your under arrest for trying to survive in public spaces in the middle of winter/heatwave after the city/state/federal has taken everything from you and there is absolutely no place to go to get out of the weather.

A short time ago, #Trump decided that 770,000 people have no US Constitution rights when he declared it #Illegal2BHomeless across the entire country. Not only do we now have to be on the lookout for city cops, shariffs, state cops, National Guards that also forgot the oath we say when joining the US Military, we have to be looking for every day haters who won't hesitate to kill us for simply not having a paid for place to live.

But the silence continues.

This entry was edited (5 months ago)
in reply to JustBob 🪖🇺🇸♒️

@bob @zakalwe

democrats fucking suck but you know what MAGA intends for the homeless

so which do you prefer?

and then you can work on them to get something more humane

remember, perfect isn't on the menu

in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

@zakalwe

I not only "prefer" the same US #Constition as everyone else AND i swore to defend, I DEMAND IT, after all. I was willing to die for CRUD oil, how about giving my life in defense of ALL THE PEOPLE IN AMERICA

in reply to Seán Fenian

@zakalwe Yes and no. Depends on how you think when you vote.

If you follow your heart when it's time to vote, not voting at all is essentially a vote of no confidence regarding all available parties.

These days, though, it's difficult to follow your heart, exactly because it's an uneven playing field, and a "vote of no confidence" doesn't work. It's quite sad...

A question, would you say the same to those that voted for Bernie Sanders?

in reply to Richard Levitte

i voted for bernie sanders in the primaries

i gave money to bernie sanders

then, in the general, i voted for hillary

not because i like hillary

i despise hillary

i voted for hillary *because i'm not a moron*

there is a time for using your heart

and there is a time for using your brain

and unfortunately, there's a lot of people out there with big hearts, and no brains

This entry was edited (5 months ago)
in reply to Patrick Morris Miller

😂

keep 'em coming! you have a greater level of wit than me: you say what i say in far fewer words

This entry was edited (5 months ago)
in reply to Richard Levitte

I voted for Bernie in the primary. When it came to ELECTION time, I voted AGAINST Trump. That's how this works. Choose, when you have the power to try to choose. When it's down to an A or B choice, even if neither is really good, either vote the least bad, or accept that whatever happens is on you.
in reply to Richard Levitte

@levitte @zakalwe There is no "no confidence" option in our system. It's a shortcoming but definitely not one you can fix by sitting out.
in reply to Richard Levitte

@levitte
No, it is not a vote of no confidence for the simple fact that there is no one who will count your vote. Instead they hear nothing from you which to them means that you don't care and are willing to leave it up to the party bosses. Not voting is the absolute dumbest thing any American citizen can do.

If you really want a vote of no confidence, write Mickey Mouse or "Weird" Al Yankvich. They will count it and it tells the bosses you don't like your choices.
@zakalwe @benroyce

in reply to James Wells

@nikatjef @levitte @zakalwe
And if you do that on the big race on the ballot you might find that some of the smaller races have people you actually like and vote there which you can't do if you stay home

reshared this

in reply to James Wells

@nikatjef @levitte @zakalwe
The place to make your opinion clear is in the primary. In the general, resign yourself to voting for the lesser of 2 evils, or accept the fact that we get the current mess, thanks to all whose conscience kept them from voting.
in reply to roblosricos

@roblosricos @PaulWermer @nikatjef @levitte @zakalwe

Except for the minor detail that every political contest that ever existed and will ever exist is a contest between the lesser of two evils. No human being is pure. Everyone has dirt on them. And in vicious politics, even very good people are smeared as evil in some way, and morons believe

Hannah Arendt's quote is used as a lazy thought-terminator

Hannah herself would be frustrated with how her quote is misused by do-nothing whiners

in reply to roblosricos

You're a do nothing whiner if you don't vote. Because if you voted you wouldn't have to do that

If you vote I have no problem with you

And I am an asshole. But I'm right about this

This entry was edited (5 months ago)
in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

calling out the ones who did not vote does nothing. They didn't vote the last time because they lacked the testicular fortitude to stand on business. They're now enemies of the people.
This entry was edited (5 months ago)
in reply to roblosricos

@roblosricos @nikatjef @levitte @zakalwe
I'm sure your ethical integrity remains intact by refusing to vote for the lesser of 2 evils.

And I'm sure there are thousands of people grateful for the worse of 2 evils that won as a result - those who will lose SNAP, the immigrants abused by ICE, the kids who will die because they didn't get vaccinated, the larger number of people who cannot afford healthcare, thios who pay more for everyday needs because of absurd tariff policies.

in reply to roblosricos

@roblosricos @PaulWermer @nikatjef @levitte @zakalwe and you're voting for MORE evil - but doing it in such a way that you get to feel smug about it.

That seems a lot worse.

in reply to Amoshias

@Amoshias @PaulWermer @nikatjef @levitte @zakalwe

that's bullshit - neither party has much of anything to offer to me, or my vision of what life could be, here on earth, if there were not so many laws preventing it from happening.

i'm always willing to come to the aid of my neighbors, with a shovel, food, or a gun.

but people keep voting for 'law and order,' and idiotic economic fantasies that never work the way they are described as working.

voting is for 'believers.'

the problem with believers is - they'll believe anygodammedthing.

in reply to roblosricos

@roblosricos @Amoshias @PaulWermer @nikatjef @levitte @zakalwe

Good for you, you're dropped out of society

Some of us want to try to fix it

Do we have your permission Rob?

Or is what is important to you is you planting your cowardly weak "everthing sucks and then you die, waah" ass on online discussions

If you quit society, fine. Good for you.
So prove you mean what you say and fuck off

in reply to roblosricos

@roblosricos
That is an extreme simplification and fails to take the argument to it's logical conclusion. If you continually vote for the lesser of two evils, you are eventually voting for then good, all the way to the two best choices for good, just one of them is the lesser good than the other.
@PaulWermer @levitte @zakalwe @benroyce
in reply to James Wells

"A choice is not freedom." — Penn Jillette
As long as they can make you pick one of two choices that they select in advance, you're lost. This is why they're all so upset about Mamdami. They didn't get to pick him.
The long-term answer here is modern ranked-choice voting, so that you can vote your conscience, the candidate you really want, without penalty, without "throwing away" your vote — and yet still have the 'lesser evil' as a fall-back JUST IN CASE.
in reply to Seán Fenian

@zakalwe
I have long been a fan of ranked-choice voting, especially in the primaries as it tends to weed out the more extremist members of each group / party... Having said that, we will never get there if people keep choosing not to vote, instead we will keep dealing with the worst of each party

@PaulWermer @roblosricos @levitte @benroyce

in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

My observations from across the pond:

- Canadian politicians and reporting seem very quaint (I mean that it the nicest possible way)
- If you don’t participate, you can’t complain, you are part of the problem
- Playing Reagan back at Trump and the MAGA was an absolute blinder - Brits my age remember him as a B actor who flirted with Thatcher, had dementia while still in office and was talked into ending Cold War by Nancy and Gorbachev. But he’s a absolute GOP hero!

Unknown parent

@DarthAstrius The primaries don't even matter. First of all, even if you manage to win a primary, you have to have people show up to be delegates through the whole long process, or else those seats go empty and uncounted. Secondly, even if you make it to the end game, in the DNC you have an additional cadre of establishment, party-line insiders with their thumbs on the scales. If you can't win them over, you shoudn't start.

Obama did it -- by making sure he was establishment-friendly.

in reply to SSFC KDT 💚💙⚽🌹💻🍺✌

"The primaries don't even matter"

i stopped reading here

you want to tell that to those who showed up for AOC?

for those who showed up for mamdani?

you do not speak of reality

you speak of your own mindless cynicism. you speak for acceptance of abuse

your rationale, en masse- all those who weakly whine and accept via weak, lying cynicism, only serves the MAGA agenda

so fuck off with your mindless acceptance

your cynicism is as bad as MAGA

This entry was edited (5 months ago)
in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

Claiming that both sides are the same and throwing away a vote against fascism because you don't like the opposition party is what peak privilege looks like.
in reply to shakethedisease

that's exactly it

nonvoters do not have principles

nonvoters have privilege, entitlement

they either don't care because it doesn't affect them

or they are so dumb they think it won't affect them, when it certainly will

people who don't vote are not even on the left

the left is a political position, an ideology, an agenda

what nonvoters have is a psychological position:

self-regard. ego. narcissism

their agenda is "i want to feel good about myself, fuck the real world"

#VOTE!

#vote
This entry was edited (5 months ago)
in reply to xyhhx :bunny_sunglasses:

thanks for the slight, and then the compliment

i'd prefer you listen to what i say, and not have a compliment

because i'm right on this

nonvoters are pathetic fucking turds whining on our way to fascism, and helping it along with their nonparticipation

This entry was edited (5 months ago)
in reply to xyhhx :bunny_sunglasses:

@xyhhx
The only reasons I can think of for when someone is unwilling to participate in order to resist fascism in all forms is that they either support it, feel as though they won't be one of the groups targeted by the regime for persecution, don't believe the threat 'can happen here', or are under the impression that the accompanying horrors are 'worth it' in the hope that when the regime collapses it will be replaced with one that perfectly aligns to their chosen ideology (and that they themselves will survive - basically that the LGBTQ+, minorities, and dissidents killed and tortured to get there are acceptable losses).

We saw the same kind of behavior in the Spanish Civil War, where the more extreme anarchists originally called for people to abstain from voting rather than vote for the Popular Front coalition. Those same anarchists would later be forced to fight alongside the Popular Front in the war against the Nazi-backed Nationalists.

This entry was edited (5 months ago)
in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

I saw such a post last night from a self-proclaimed anarchist. I'm getting more Pure Democracy myself as I get older, but not meaningfully participating participating in the system we have now is actually not going to get me closer to that goal.
Unknown parent

@AeonCypher @admin @john @ShredderFeeder

that's it:

#learnedHelplessness

they see corruption, money in politics, gerrymandering and disenfranchisement, liars who change positions and use waffle words, etc

then they do something inexplicable:

they give up. they accept

they imagine corporatist centrists dems as omnipotent aliens they can do nothing about

no, you spineless turds, you just show the fuck up in the primaries

your cynical weakness is a bigger problem than corruption

#VOTE!

Unknown parent

Carolyn
@AeonCypher Exactly. And the "voting not working" is because not enough people are voting. Nag friends and family to vote. Challenge them. These days, there have been elections won by a vote. There are currently people in US office only because no one ran against them. @admin @benroyce @john @ShredderFeeder
Unknown parent

Magical Cat

@mloxton @admin @john @ShredderFeeder

I have another personal cheat for that, and it works worldwide, what to expect from a politician in another country, or here in Georgia country where I am.

See what this politician says about Ukraine, russia terrorist state, and war criminal putin.

I understand that at "the west" many politicians tend to ignore foreign policy altogether and even lack a brief page about foreign policy at their programme websites. But this says a lot to me too.

Unknown parent

@admin @AeonCypher @john @ShredderFeeder

who fucking gives a shit

you never get perfect

you always get some sort of compromise with the devil

it's *politics* for fucks sake, not a holy purity party

*obviously* mamdani is better, you agree with that and you see that, so you go for mamdani

*then you iterate to better*

*there is no better deal. ever. anywhere*

you don't invent these endless whining excuses for why things are not perfect, then use that as an excuse not to participate

Unknown parent

SlightlyCyberpunk
@AeonCypher @john @ShredderFeeder No, the party pulls the DSA to the right. I've been a DSA member since 2011, seen it plenty. Look at Mamdani right now. He got where he is because of a huge effort by NYC DSA, then he turns around and hires DNC folks to run his campaign, starts distancing himself from the DSA, says he doesn't stand for their platform, says in interviews that "socialist" doesn't mean anything about policy it's just about how hard he will fight...I'm not saying he's not still miles ahead of the other candidates, but we're watching in real time as the Democrats pull this DSA candidate further to the right. It seems like he could have won as a socialist and not had to water down his platform and not had to feed more power into the corporate Democratic party.
in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

@ssfckdt @DarthAstrius Despite what anyone says, most of the world doesn't look to the USA as any kind of beacon or leader, especially in Canada, where we get tired of being in your shadow.

Having said that, primaries are one thing the USA has that I wish we had here. To have a say in who a party leader is, you have to join that party, and most parties won't let you join if you already belong to another party. Even then, only parliament gets to vote for who the prime minister will be.

TLDR: Appreciate what levers you have.

Unknown parent

@AeonCypher @admin @john @ShredderFeeder

you see it with AOC too

"oh no, look at {X}, oh no, she's not perfect"

and then they endlessly whine about left elected officials... and utterly ignore MAGA

da fuq?

navel gazing self-destruction

some of them might be genuinely this fragile and impotent

but they might as well be MAGA or geopolitical troll farm trying to hurt the left with this weak psyop, because that's the only real world effect

Unknown parent

@alexadeswift @evoluxa

well, where are you?

i'm just scoping these words to american nonvoters

no one has a problem with people who can't vote, the problem is people can vote but choose not to

Unknown parent

Democracy Dies in Dumbass

@CStamp I've always heard it said "Don't let the perfect be the enemy of the good."

it's pretty straight forward. Vote for the best of the available options, or conversely, vote against the worst.

I didn't think Hilary Clinton was the best option we could have fielded, but I fucking voted for her because I knew how this ended even back in 2016.

@benroyce @admin@mastodon.slightlycyberpunk.com @AeonCypher @john

in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

@Ben Royce 🇺🇦 🇸🇩 Be honest: If Harris was suddenly magically in office tomorrow, do you think that, in the next three years, she would actually fix anything that Trump has done? Would the tariffs end? Would the support for Israel? Would the oppression at the border, and ICE agents, and military?

No. She'd just keep doing it, only the media would say less about it and her toadies would be so much more hand-wringy about it. The odd time it would get brought up, they'd go, "Well, we're working on it, but these darn Republicans just keep blocking us!" or "We made this one tiny concession!" like they always do.

Meanwhile, on the other side, the Republicans would be storming because the Dems aren't being evil enough, and meanwhile would get even worse for next time.

That's how this works. Ironically, electing Democrats actually makes shit worse. We say "both sides same" because they really actually are.

in reply to Ferret

"do you think that, in the next three years, she would actually fix anything that Trump has done?"

yes

try harder, "BoTh SiDeS tHe SaMe" lying ignorant troll

This entry was edited (5 months ago)
in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

@Ben Royce 🇺🇦 🇸🇩 Welp, Biden didn't. Obama didn't. In fact, they both just took what the Republicans before them did and quietly made them worse. Meanwhile, they were called "the wokest president the US has ever seen" and used as an excuse for the following Republican administration to become worse still.

And you call me ignorant? You need to base your rhetoric on reality.

in reply to Ferret

@ferret

ok "comrade ferret" thanks for the lesson in moronic disinfo based on believing nothing ever changes, deploying mindless denial of the radioactively obvious, and wallowing in zero effort cynicism

sorry, i mean "reality" 🤣

truly the stunning height of intellect, i have been schooled

fuck off you pathetic lying troll

This entry was edited (5 months ago)
in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

@AeonCypher @john @ShredderFeeder because we all know MAGA fuckin sucks, but so many people pretend the DNC is our damn savior. They're not. They're mostly keeping people trapped in a cycle of voting for corporate stooges. They keep people voting for assholes like Manchin because "At lEasT he'S nOt a RepUbliCan!" and thinking that alone is going to be enough to save us.

Vote for the best person on the ballot regardless of which, if any, party sponsors them. Support the best person running regardless of how much money they've got. And support community groups beyond those owned by a party that's owned by corporate interests. We'd be in a much better place if people did some more of those.

in reply to Democracy Dies in Dumbass

@ShredderFeeder Yep. It's putting on adult pants and trying to make things better. Adults know better than to expect anything to be perfect. The purity voters in the US have done so much damage, it will unlikely be fixed in their lifetimes. @benroyce @AeonCypher @john
in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

Content warning: channelling Shoresy

Unknown parent

@mrose @luupies @zakalwe @ssfckdt

mitch a warning: luupies is deploying misogynist slurs elsewhere in this thread. not worst your time

in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

my god we're glad this f*kin Hoekstra idiot pissed off from the Netherlands. This is a fckin MAGA fantasy book dimwit claiming all sorts of Facebook facts and then imagining stuff of his own.

Imagine when people thought ambassadors were actual ambassadors to build trust and relationships. Nope, not this fckin dweeb Hoekstra.

I'm glad we got rid of him. But i'm sorry this piece of sh*t is now someone else's problem.

This entry was edited (5 months ago)
in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

Thanks for being embarrassed and expressing it (on behalf of many Americans is how I'm interpreting it).

As a Canadian it helps me cope.

in reply to SlightlyCyberpunk

@admin @AeonCypher @john @ShredderFeeder

yes, yes, i'm well aware of the endless endless "dems are omnipotent beings of power i can do nothing about, and i'll criticize the fuck out of the left side of things and ignore the right literally murdering us" level of brilliance

MAGA and Russia love your broken mentality friend

is it that you don't care about the effect of your rhetoric? or is it that you're deploying this rhetoric on purpose to sabotage the left? which is it?

in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

@AeonCypher @john @ShredderFeeder The DNC are the ones sabotaging the left by endlessly convincing people to vote for the kindler, gentler oligarch. The Democrats are still a right-wing party by any objective metric.

If we have the power to reform the Dems, then we have the power to stop fucking around with these corrupt middle-managers and build something better. If we don't, then we need to fix that first before we can do anything else. Either way I don't see where getting in bed with corporate lobbyists and CEOs actually helps us.

Unknown parent

an election:

60% support the left

40% support the right

who wins?

if we #vote, Dems do (the nominal left party in the #USA, as much as they suck, and they do)

what happens in reality?

MAGA obediently votes, whiners on the left go "i want perfect, waah"

40% vote GOP
30% vote dems
20% whine on social media and don't vote
10% vote for stunt unicorn rainbow party

who wins?

welcome to #FPTP voting

nonvote/ 3rd party is support for #MAGA in our shitty system

This entry was edited (5 months ago)
in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

Taking Hannah Arendt's advice: Vote for the lesser of two evils, and never forget that you voted for evil.

I mean this literally. I never thought I'd support a candidate whose campaign normalized a genocide. But I did vote for Kamala and I would again.

If you feel good about voting R then you're evil and stupid. If you feel good about voting D then you're just evil. Either way you don't deserve freedom.

in reply to David Bramian

the problem with this is that every single choice, in every single society, from the dawn of time, to forever, can be phrased as a choice between the lesser of two evils

that's all politics ever was and ever will be

forever

perfection is never on the menu

all you get is better. or worse

that's it

there is nothing else

Hannah Arendt herself would probably say "okay you misunderstood me, we're talking about MAGA you stupid fucks, just vote already" (probably not her exact words)

This entry was edited (5 months ago)
in reply to craignicol

which you get by voting, not by making declarations on social media

everyone hates FPTP. but you have to work through that shit to get past that shit

it's the only way

This entry was edited (5 months ago)
in reply to SlightlyCyberpunk

@admin @AeonCypher @john @ShredderFeeder

again, i told you i am well aware of this endless cynical "BoTh SiDeS tHe SaMe" shtick. it doesn't impress me. you do not speak of reality. you speak of your mindless cynicism and weak helplessness

you speak of your acceptance

"no i don't"

you do

what you do is you fight, and you start with the tools before you

speak of the fight, or be pegged as another whiner helping MAGA. because that is all you are doing whether you are aware of it or not

in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

This is effectively the same statement as "vote blue no matter who", and that is exactly why the conservative Democratic Party establishment will never, ever move left. "We're marginally better than the other guy," doesn't mean they are better enough to make a meaningful difference. The way to get them to move left is to abandon them, not to roll over for them.
This entry was edited (5 months ago)
in reply to Gemma Seymour

Don't position yourself as wiser than others, when there is reasonable disagreement on this issue. You've made your choice, you need to recognize the agency of others.
in reply to Gemma Seymour

you yourself can't speak of wisdom if you speak of lack of meaningful difference

i believe there is meaningful difference between the GOP and the Democrats

i don't say there shouldn't be more meaningful difference, of course there should be

but no one serious is saying there is little meaningful difference, which is an ignorant lie

so i will continue to speak and claim wisdom, since your words do not dispute my words, because the basis of your objection is unsound

This entry was edited (5 months ago)
in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

@AeonCypher @john @ShredderFeeder choosing the lesser evil is not fighting, it is accepting evil. We need to put up an actual fight. On every front, not just the occasional election. And against every enemy, not just the worst of the worst. Anyone that's getting millions of dollars in bribes -- sorry, "campaign contributions" -- from Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, Honeywell, Comcast, AT&T, etc are not our allies. They *are* the system we need to defeat and I fear their propaganda has captured you. "Acceptance" and "helplessness" is saying that we must play by their rules within their system, that we cannot possibly hope to create any alternative that isn't owned by the billionaires.
in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

It'd be nice if left-leaning US voters stopped applying purity tests to the left wing candidates. Perfect is the enemy of good, especially when the alternative is extremely bad.
in reply to Ian

@soviut I don't know that it's possible. It may just be part of being on the left. Here's the underlying issue:

The right craves power. They don't dig, they don't question.
The left craves equity often to treating all items with equal weight.

The right will disingenuously use liberal (eg: cishet male 'but lesbians need to be safe from trans') arguments.
The left is diverse, we will consider these arbitrary divides. Investment can make some lose sight of the broader picture.

@Ian
in reply to obscurestar

@obscurestar I get it; I just think that the left needs to consider how much worse the alternative is.

Unfortunately, you're not voting FOR a candidate, your voting AGAINST the party that wants to destroy you.

in reply to Ian

@soviut Oh yes. I fully agree. Nations steer like barges. They're large and unwieldy and everything has to shift around the center mass which wants to stay where it is. The whole 'my way or the highway' mindset is really right wing ideology if you think about it, 'My feels are more valid than the group consensus. Eff the group.' However it's probably not constructive to express it that way. Shaming tends to make people dig in harder.
@Ian
in reply to obscurestar

@obscurestar @soviut

well said but i'm going to shame the fuck out of nonvoters

if for no other reason than it's a hail mary- one of our few options for a path back to sanity

of course i'll just turn a lot off. but they don't vote anyways, so they're already useless

and you can't cater to their precious feelings, we're supposed to be talking about fucking adults

and their feelings suck anyways, it's all self-congratulation on their precious precious self-regard at the expense of reality

in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

@obscurestar @soviut I live in a solid Tory (conservative) electorate but I still cast my vote every time to at least register as one person that doesn’t support our prick of an MP and his fuckwit party currently in government.
in reply to Alan Campbell

Perfect. If I got a vote from every person who said their vote didn’t count, I’d be ruling the world.
This entry was edited (5 months ago)
Unknown parent

Astrius ☭

Another thing, if your state supports ranked choice voting, and there is a more progressive candidate running against the Democrat, rank that candidate first, and the Democrat second.

We need ranked choice voting in the United States, join your state Ranked Choice Voting organization. #USpol #RankedChoiceVoting #RCV #supportRCV

in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

Meanwhile the bad guys spent decades voting for imperfect candidates, and now they're getting the change they always wanted.
in reply to SlightlyCyberpunk

@admin @AeonCypher @john @ShredderFeeder

100% false

every single choice, in every single society, from the dawn of time to forever, is a choice between the lesser of two evils

that's all politics ever was and ever will be

forever

perfection is never on the menu

Hannah Arendt herself would probably say "okay you misunderstood me, we're talking about MAGA you stupid fucks, just vote already" (probably not her exact words)

all you are telling me is that you are guided by toxic idealism

in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

weird, i've been voting D in every election at every level for decades and we are even more turbofucked than ever. it's not insane at this point to wonder if maybe that is not getting us anywhere
in reply to Cap E Bara

@cap_ybarra

if you vote, you're doing something right

the problem is all the other assholes around you not voting

you joining them in not voting, because you perceive things are getting worse even though you vote, is misattribution of the source of the problem

the problem is nonvoters

and you joining them won't solve the problem you accurately perceive, it will only make things even worse

in reply to SlightlyCyberpunk

@AeonCypher

choosing the lesser evil is not fighting, it is accepting evil.


It's fighting when the other side is choosing the greater evil, which they are.

On every front, not just the occasional election.


Yes, no argument there. The concern is this toxic pattern on the left of "I hate both choices so I'll stay home" when one of the choices wants to force you to stay home forever.

I think the thing that flabbergasts me most about leftists is that they act like the Dems can't be co-opted and changed from within while, meanwhile, MAGA is the result of the fascists co-opting and changing the Republicans from within. The Tea Party co-opted politics in one party starting at the local and state level and percolating up, until they were electing anti-scientists to state and federal office.

Like... Are the leftists just going to throw in the towel and accept they're less effective than fascists? If so, they'll, sadly, get the outcome they deserve.

They get one Bernie Sanders near the finish line, one time, and when he doesn't succeed they give up and say "I guess everything's doomed forever." Don't declare the hill not climbable because you put your hand on a stone and realized they're made of rock, right?

This entry was edited (5 months ago)
Unknown parent

@privateblack

keep my sober my friend! you're thinking clearly

Unknown parent

Baron Von J
@DarthAstrius
The primaries are so ridiculously ignored in this country given how many people say they won't vote at all because the candidates aren't good enough.
@benroyce
Unknown parent

@rzeta0 @mark @admin @AeonCypher @john @ShredderFeeder

so the democrats suck on gaza

and the GOP sucks worse

right?

but to not vote for the democrats, en masse, means the GOP wins

so, guided by your feeling for gazans, you can wind up hurting gazans even more, if your rationale helps the GOP win

that is not your intention. your heart is in the right place. but sometimes cold strategy and a willingness to accept better instead of perfect might be the best choice for those you care about

Unknown parent

@rzeta0 @mark @admin @AeonCypher @john @ShredderFeeder

that's not true

the democrats are *marginally* better than the GOP on gaza

it's perfectly fine to think that is not enough

but then you're saying you don't care to do anything to try to improve the usa's position on gaza, just because all you get is minor improvement

ok then

well i do care

and there's lots of other issues too i care about

so we have "both sides the same, do nothing" vs "not really, also other issues, do something"

🤷

Unknown parent

@jstatepost @admin @AeonCypher @john @ShredderFeeder

oh i knew already

i'm the guy who sees the giant nest of wasps and runs into it with a shit eating grin

😅

Unknown parent

D Ingram

@AeonCypher @admin @john @ShredderFeeder The $ spent on voter suppression has changed my mind about Australia's compulsory voting (*attendance at polling place). The electoral commission does everything they can to make sure citizens are enrolled, and when counting votes the presumption is the vote is valid if intent is clear.

Not having to spend effort encouraging or discouraging voting changes the influence dynamic. Actual policies matter. And lots of pork barrelling.

Unknown parent

Steve Holden
@mloxton @admin @john @ShredderFeeder
If ever America failed a “lesser ov two evils” decision (usually the only choice) it was the last presidential election. Harris was not an attractive choice, but look at what it got.
Unknown parent

@AeonCypher
absolutely

maybe you're cueing me in on a rationale i didn't consider:

do people think "not being a purist" means "no standards at all"?

i guess i have to be explicit about these things because your objection seems obvious to me

but i suppose your right:

some people think that not being a purist means accepting nazis, which seems crazy to me. there is an intermediate road here: rational standards. but i suppose i should be clear

This entry was edited (5 months ago)
Unknown parent

John Mierau

@AeonCypher @jstatepost @admin @ShredderFeeder

I'd like to carve out a small exception in this discussion: I agree purity tests are the moral equivalent of punching yourself in the face...

...but minimal viable standards of not racist or Nazi or Fetterman, please.

Unknown parent

libramoon

@tregeagle @admin @john @ShredderFeeder

not voting is letting all those strangers vote for you

Unknown parent

@AeonCypher
both of you aren't helping shit, and only voicing a mindless cynicism that accelerates our slide to fascism

it doesn't matter if your hearts are in the right place if you're not strategizing effectively

if we listen to you two, we might as well just give up and let the world go to even far worse shit. you realize it can do that right? do you care? are you not aware? does the pain of how much it sucks now force you welcome even worse?

This entry was edited (5 months ago)
Unknown parent

SlightlyCyberpunk

@rzeta0 @mark @AeonCypher @john @ShredderFeeder Yup. And supporting them even though they suck is never going to get us a better option.

And hell, even once you get someone through the primary they immediately start shifting right. Dems assume anyone left of center is going to be forced to vote for them anyway, and there's no party mechanism to keep them in line, so they keep moving further right in an attempt to "expand their base". (Or maybe they just do what their big donors say, either way it's the same effect) That's why Harris was literally campaigning with Republicans, touting endorsements from war criminals like Cheney!

Unknown parent

no steve is fine. i think it's just a language thing

"attractive candidate" does not imply physical beauty in the minds of an american english speaker. it immediately brings to mind a candidate attractive on issues

fediverse is international so these things happen, and it's ok. but really, there's nothing in what steve said that you're reading into it

it's just a language thing. it is what it is

This entry was edited (5 months ago)
in reply to Steve Holden

@holdenweb @mloxton @admin @john @ShredderFeeder you sound misogonistic in this post. You wozldn't use "attractive" as an requirement for male canditates. Even though I assume you do not mean physical attraction, I think it is belittling.
Unknown parent

@rzeta0 @mark @admin @john @ShredderFeeder

alright, i'll tell mamdani and omar that

come on tariq: posturing amongst bigots and racists for power struggles over the issue of gaza and israel is nothing at all like the principled stand you're looking for. these people on the right have no problem genociding anyone anywhere. you can't look to them for anything. at best you get lies, and then more murder. please, don't misrepresent what these MAGA tools are, and don't fall for their snake tongues

Unknown parent

@AeonCypher @admin @rzeta0 @mark @john @ShredderFeeder

yes you can dig deeper psychologically with these sort of fake leftist nonvoters

does the narcissist looking in the mirror saying the things that make them sound good and pure really care about anything else in life?

in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

where's the evidence that incrementalism works?

We've seen a decline over the last 100 years, and things have not incrementally gotten better.

in reply to Pope Bob the Unsane

yes, if you wish to destroy democracy, you frame your statements starting with the proposition that that end goal is already reality

but is that reality? or mindless cynicism

and if you've already arrived at "everything sucks and then you die waah waah" why even speak at all?

you have it all figured out

let the silly fools in the mud fighting for something better struggle

and you may laugh, as your propositional empty cynicism requires

i see you

This entry was edited (5 months ago)
in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

you've arrived at the 'we must vote to change things' conclusion when there are other ways, more effective ways, to change things.

edit: I don't think you see me, maybe sometime you will.

This entry was edited (5 months ago)
in reply to Pope Bob the Unsane

@bobdobberson

well that's true: i don't see you if you only allude mystically to "other ways" without speaking on them

you must speak plainly what these other ways are, as i speak plainly on the ways i believe will change things, and let those other ways be criticized as obliquely as you criticize the ways i articulate

otherwise, it's not a matter of not seeing you, it's more a matter of there is nothing to see at all:

you got nothing

in reply to Pope Bob the Unsane

@bobdobberson yes Bob you already replied. Calm down Bob. Don't get excited it's not 4 o'clock yet. You'll get the feed the ducks soon just like you do every day Bob
in reply to Pope Bob the Unsane

@bobdobberson @mls14 Matt don't take the bait here. He's onto us and we're in danger of losing our Soros bucks. Let's meet up at the next Illuminati conclave and address how our plot has been revealed by this Pope Bob
in reply to Ashwin Dixit

Ashwin please don't repeat the Subject 35b incident. I'm still dealing with the paperwork
This entry was edited (5 months ago)
in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

@bobdobberson @mls14

EVERYBODY wants to MAGA!

We just disagree on the time-frame.

Republicans want to take America back a century or two, with slavery, and their privilege intact.

Native Americans want to take America back 600 years, before colonists committed genocide and took over the land.

Democrats are the least ambitious. They only want to MAGA to a year ago, when they were all comfy cozy.

Take America Forward, not try to regain some old glory based on lies and murder.

in reply to Pope Bob the Unsane

@bobdobberson @purrperl @mls14 generally all billionaires suck, but focusing on soros is a trick of right wing manufactured outrage so the maga zombies ignore the billionaires zombifyng them. It's an easy trick for such dingbats. And thus any sort of obsession with soros in particular, rather than all plutocrat meddling, is a tell
in reply to Pope Bob the Unsane

@bobdobberson @purrperl @mls14 please don't post faithless as I absolutely love faithless and that means I have to reconsider my antipathy towards your overall political wankery
in reply to Pope Bob the Unsane

like sitting in sickly cold bath water 2 hours after i should have gotten out of the tub
This entry was edited (5 months ago)
in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

er...? OK... Yes... Soros is just as bad as anyone else who has accumulated wealth.

If you for a moment imagined that I favored Soros for any reason, please take that as a moment to understand that you do not know me.

I've never seen Soros as a 'positive' in any direction.

@purrperl @mls14

in reply to Pope Bob the Unsane

@bobdobberson @purrperl @mls14

I dont really care about your specific feelings about soros

I consider any focus on soros specifically, as opposed to seeing plutocrats in general as the enemy, as a sign of maga indoctrination

in reply to Pope Bob the Unsane

@bobdobberson @purrperl @mls14

Yes

Now hold still

Psionics are almost complete

And in a moment all of this will be properly psychologically retrofitted and you will be properly tranquilized

in reply to Pope Bob the Unsane

@bobdobberson in the US in the last 100 years, immigration has been reopened, Black people generally vote and win, gay people grow up expecting to be out and treated civilly, almost no babies and small children die before growing up, (and for all the warts, many of us have these amazing devices that connect us to the people, knowledge, and creativity of the species). For sure we have to again fight to preserve our wins, but I can't even read an analysis that denies all these victories.
in reply to Chris L

pope bob has a narrative to sell that is important to their garden variety low brow retail cynicism

it's a stale dreary flimsy narrative, but let them try their song and dance so we can be entertained by the effort

then cut it down with ease

This entry was edited (5 months ago)
in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

@rzeta0 @mark @AeonCypher @john @ShredderFeeder The way I see it you're the one giving up and accepting whatever scraps the billionaires drop for you.

I'm still fighting to build something better. We should have done that fifty years ago, but second best time is now I guess. The rest of the developed world managed to figure it out, why do you insist that America can't ever have anything better than our current two-party system?

in reply to SlightlyCyberpunk

@AeonCypher
oh is that what you're doing?

are you growing this better country in your vegetable patch?

at best you're organizing some local mutual aid, and since you ignored the make up of your politics, the fascists just come and machine gun you laughing, since you let them have all the power without a fight

you're helping the fascists by not participating

and making any other struggle you are doing infinitely more difficult

This entry was edited (5 months ago)
Unknown parent

Patrick Morris Miller
@AnnieBuddy @obscurestar @soviut You may not have intended to, but you're reminding me of the great words of Benjamin Franklin 'Hawkeye' Pierce: "There are no innocent bystanders in Hell."
Unknown parent

@rzeta0 @mark @admin @john @ShredderFeeder

right and how do we make mamdani and omar the majority?

you do so with my rationale

with your rationale, we give up and let even the tiny minority disappear, and then things certainly get worse on everything you care about

in reply to Ilka 🌐

are you german?

i wouldn't be surprised if this made sense, in german

i'm just saying, and i'm being honest with you, when someone says "attractive candidate" in a general political sense in american english (and they aren't in a bar with a drunk lout), that they are talking issues, not physicality

and it's not a big deal

these language barriers are what they are. best we can do is work through them, and be sensitive with our words

This entry was edited (5 months ago)
in reply to SlightlyCyberpunk

@admin @rzeta0 @AeonCypher @john @ShredderFeeder They start shifting right because the right tends to show up to vote and the left doesn't.

When they're trying to maximize their chance of winning the entire election, of course they're going to drift towards the votes. Failing to vote is a self-fulfilling prophecy.

Unknown parent

@bytebro @ShredderFeeder In approximately 100% of cases they're lying, and that's just code for "I'm too fucking lazy to get my arse down to the polling station".
Unknown parent

@Wyatt_H_Knott @bobdobberson

i understand what you speak of, and considering the immense amount of suffering, and the uncertainty of the results, obviously everyone would say "we should have just voted"

because you know what?

imagine you win this struggle (which is not guaranteed), and after all the blood and gore, what are you going to have?

a vote

and you know what you'll also have?

"well i don't think these candidates are perfect" whiny shit

all over again

do you see the real problem?

Unknown parent

James Wells

@rzeta0
Not voting is accepting evil. You are not telling the parties anything, and because you are not saying anything, the parties are free to accept their belief as something you are comfortable with.

@mark @admin @benroyce @AeonCypher @john @ShredderFeeder

Unknown parent

@Wyatt_H_Knott @bobdobberson

and you're still fucked why?

because of all the assholes around you not voting

in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

@Wyatt_H_Knott @bobdobberson They literally wrote a song about this.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SHhrZgojY1Q

Sidebar: I think the Brits have a surprisingly robust thought process about this kind of thing because, among other things, they tried overthrowing their government. Back when it was far less representative than it is now.

What they got was a man with a stick so firmly up is ass that he literally canceled Christmas. He was dictator 'til he died, then they all looked at each other and...

... put Charles II on the throne.

Everyone talks revolution thinking they're gonna be Washington, and history shows they are usually Cromwell.

(... and even Washington should be remembered for cementing a slavery institution that lasted longer than it did in the UK).

Unknown parent

@admin @mark @rzeta0 @AeonCypher @john @ShredderFeeder

and like i said, then MAGA comes in with machine guns, calls you "communist pedophiles" and kills you all while laughing

because you neglected something very important in your struggle, and let it slide to worse and worse

Unknown parent

correct, you're actually fucked because of both nazis and nonvoters

and you know you can't do anything about the nazis

and you know the other choice you speak of is uncertain outcome and vast suffering

so you should be angry at the assholes who can't be bothered to vote, because they made the difference that put the nazis in power

and if (big if) you were to win via the other choice, it will begin to fall apart again because of the nonparticipatory assholes

This entry was edited (5 months ago)
Unknown parent

Grassroots Joe

@Wyatt_H_Knott

Voting is table stakes. Far more than voting is needed, but if people can't even get up off the couch to vote, well, yeah, then we're fucked.

I'm "retired", except I retired to help run my local Indivisible group, help run dozens of phone bank shifts, help organize protests, send out call to action and messaging info emails to our members, collaborate with leaders of sister groups across PA, and more.

Still more is needed.

Who will step up to help?

@benroyce @bobdobberson

Unknown parent

@AeonCypher @admin @mark @rzeta0 @john @ShredderFeeder

the way they speak in such "brave" defense of not voting, one wonders if they are even DSA at all

it's so very easy to cosplay, in order to work the agenda of MAGA or geopolitical designs

Unknown parent

well we may very well be headed that way

then you can trust that i will be right there with you

do you mind if i try to get these assholes to vote in the interim?

you vote still

so you understand the stopgap value

i mean they still vote in fucking venezuela. it's ignored. but it still matters to make the corrupt forces peddle harder and focus the people's attention on the malice. it matters

This entry was edited (5 months ago)
Unknown parent

@Wyatt_H_Knott @bobdobberson

it's ok. so am i. i think of everyone i've encountered on the fediverse, and i think you have the closest temperament to mine

Unknown parent

yeah

ah, fuck

well at least let me unload on these narcissistic fucking nonvoters who along with maga brought us to this shit

This entry was edited (5 months ago)
in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

@AeonCypher Well, to be fair, as I've told you before, I'm *Rhode Island* DSA. RI has been "voting blue no matter who" for fucking decades. We did have one senator about twenty years ago but we haven't voted for a Republican president since the damn 80s. We're as "blue" as it gets and still have all the same problems as everywhere else because these Dems are all in bed with developers and defense contractors. We don't face off with MAGA militias at No Kings, we get heckled by Dems for carrying Palestine flags.

As I've said before, If I were in Texas, I'd probably be a little more open to the "lesser evil" strategy to block the Republicans. But up here, that's a waste of a vote. *Someone* has to be building an alternative, and this seems like a pretty good place to do it.

This entry was edited (5 months ago)
Unknown parent

Democracy Dies in Dumbass

@Osteopenia_Powers We're going to need about 40 years of consistent democratic government to have a chance at undoing the fucking damage this yabos have done...

@benroyce @tk @the5thColumnist

Unknown parent

Grassroots Joe

@aapis

Re: That is a binary choice, which I consider to be a one-party state. What would you call it?

I call it making sure that the fascist party is kept out of power.

There are still two parties, one may suck, but they do care about doing helpful things for working people even if they aren't very good at it.

The other party wants to make working people suffer and eliminate any chance of reducing that suffering.

That's a whopping big choice.

@benroyce @RegGuy @zakalwe @levitte

in reply to SlightlyCyberpunk

@admin @AeonCypher @mark @rzeta0 @john @ShredderFeeder

the problem with your rationale is that enough people like you, and safe blue becomes purple, and purple becomes red

you're acting like your rationale is unique to you. your rationale in aggregate with others is doing serious damage

work for the DSA

but do it the bernie/ mamdani way

take over the rotten dems

Unknown parent

i'm the kind of idiot who sees a nest of vipers, strips naked, and runs in to play with them 😆
This entry was edited (5 months ago)
Unknown parent

the UK is a parliamentary system

in the USA's fptp voting system alone: a 3rd party splits the left and guarantees a MAGA win

there is no joining forces between parties in coalition like in the uk. our system can't work like that. it's a shitty system

so we have to do it the mamdani way

it's not that i think taking over the dems is easy. i acknowledge all the difficulties

but i'm telling you the third party way is even worse possibilities

This entry was edited (5 months ago)
Unknown parent

@dnkboston @Wyatt_H_Knott

you're doing fine deb

it's the nonvoting assholes failing you, and us

Unknown parent

Deb Nam-Krane

@Wyatt_H_Knott I really want to avoid your way. It doesn't play to any of my strengths.

I've showed up in every election since 92, and this is where we are. True. Just as I've been a vegetarian since 1988 and climate change is comically awful. I didn't make anything better, but I didn't make it worse. It's a small w, but I'll take it.

@benroyce

in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

Why, thank you. Same to you and @Wyatt_H_Knott

[Insert corollary about meat eaters, except I don't want to start a *real* fight]

Unknown parent

@Wyatt_H_Knott @dnkboston

you're a fighter wyatt. a better fighter than me

i just want to fight in a different sphere until the last possible minute

which may be foolish

Unknown parent

right, i wasn't clear:

you have fptp and parliamentary

we only have fptp

the parliamentary part of your system lends stability and feasibility to 3rd parties

we don't have that

3rd party is not feasible in the usa

it has to be take over the dems

not because i like that, or think it's easy, but because it's the only way

This entry was edited (5 months ago)
Unknown parent

@Wyatt_H_Knott @dnkboston

hey!

i never purchased an apple product in my life

i never opened a facebook account

just flexing

you're correct in aggregate

Unknown parent

yes, i use google products

so much for my flex

😆

This entry was edited (5 months ago)
Unknown parent

Democracy Dies in Dumbass
@Osteopenia_Powers I am as well, however, I don't think it will get fixed in my lifetime, so right now I'm just trying to say employed and live it out. @benroyce @tk @the5thColumnist
Unknown parent

@Wyatt_H_Knott @dnkboston 🤣

Facebookers Anonymous

i suppose that's what the fediverse is

no this is Twitterers Anonymous

in reply to Democracy Dies in Dumbass

@ShredderFeeder @Osteopenia_Powers @tk

Perhaps if things get so bad it will all collapse and the only thing that will save it as a Constitutional Convention to write a new American Constitution not written for 18th century but the 21st.

Unknown parent

@WatchingTVnFilm @tk @ShredderFeeder

That is why ranked ballot voting would let voters vote for their preferred candidate as their first choice but not lose the chance to vote for the better of the two most likely to win candidates.

For elections of legislatures with parties, rotational representation allows all parties to be represented proportional to their support.

Unknown parent

@roblosricos @RegGuy @joeinwynnewood @zakalwe @levitte

Did you vote?

If you did good

If you didn't you're fine with more executed and abused

Unknown parent

roblosricos

@RegGuy @joeinwynnewood @zakalwe @levitte

due process to send political dissidents back to their countries of origin to be executed?

see, that's how fascism works - it follows the laws it likes, ignores the ones it doesn't, and makes up new ones more to its liking.

none of those executed deserved to die, and came to the US seeking asylum.

Unknown parent

Joe (TBA)

@roblosricos

The deportations were done legally. Obama didn't use brownshirts to grab people off the streets and disapear them. There was due process. People can disagree that they should have gotten asylum, but it's not the same.

Clinton made an error in judgment, to be sure, but the situation in Waco needed to be dealt with. He again didn't do so outside the law.

You are missing the point or are willfully ignorant of what is going on today.

@joeinwynnewood @benroyce @zakalwe @levitte

Unknown parent

roblosricos

@RegGuy @joeinwynnewood @zakalwe @levitte

let's see - Obama deported more people than GW Bush, many of whom were taken directly off the planes and executed.

and Clinton had the FBI and BATF murder every man, woman, and child in the Branch Davidian complex, in Waco, Texas.

tell me the difference, again?

oh - those deaths didn't directly involve YOU.

i get it.

Unknown parent

Joe (TBA)

@roblosricos

Let's see, Jan 2021 - Jan 2025, no troops in Portland, check. Democratic president
2025, troops in Portland check, Republican president.

Which one is the fascist party?

Gee, really?

@joeinwynnewood @benroyce @zakalwe @levitte

in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

@RegGuy @joeinwynnewood @zakalwe @levitte

i'm fine with a revolution.

to break up this over-powered, racist, oligarchical shit-storm of a nation, into smaller, more controllable pieces.

it is long over-due, and people comfortable enough with the 'lesser evils' are the ones preventing this.

it is inevitable, and needs to happen, and it would be great if you voters would acknowledge that, and vote for parties who support that.

in reply to roblosricos

@roblosricos @RegGuy @joeinwynnewood @zakalwe @levitte

So you're a cosplaying moron, unaware a revolution would be massive suffering dwarfing anything that bothers you now, and the winner might even be worse

All because voting hurts your precious fee fees

Is there a reason you follow me?

I'd prefer a block, know nothing asshole

in reply to roblosricos

@roblosricos @RegGuy @joeinwynnewood @zakalwe @levitte

Go dude, fight MAGA goons in the streets. All because voting is too hard for you. When it was your nonvote that made ICE the way it is today. You're a genius

Unknown parent

So here we go with the tired typical "this is what they want to do, and I'm going to assume it already happened, because I'm ruled by fear and cowardice"

Premature capitulation

Cynical acceptance

So fucking weak

This country is 1/3 fascists, 1/3 coherent, and 1/3 spineless turds

The elections are controlled by the states, politics professor. Sure some red states might do as you say, but they're already red

This entry was edited (5 months ago)
in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

if you honestly think voting is still going to happen now, *you're* the moron.

trump will not allow federal elections when his term ends. we should all know this, it's extremely obvious by how he's been calling himself a king, and even how he told his supporters ages ago that they wouldn't have to vote anymore.

so what's the alternative to voting? revolution. we need a revolution, BECAUSE we can't vote. otherwise, we could just vote him out,

but we can't.

in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

There is totally a place for fighting MAGA goons. But we could have stopped them earlier. It's on us as a nation that we're having to fight them in the streets today.

When I was much younger, I was active in the UK's Ecology Party. I was deeply involved in writing its defense policy ... well, OK, I was half of the team that wrote it. Along the way we came up with the thought concept of democratic war: the idea that a society's citizens will only fight for it (without forced conscription, that is) if it's worth fighting for in the first place.

It never really occurred to us to consider the case of a society whose STATED IDEALS are worth fighting for, but whose citizens will not fight to see them made practice because they just plain DGAF about them.

in reply to Seán Fenian

@zakalwe @joeinwynnewood @roblosricos @levitte @RegGuy I don't think it's that Americans DGAF about the stated ideals. I think they don't believe those are the actual ideals any longer and that those who claim to be fighting for them are the precise opposite of said ideals.

It's a toxic blend of cynicism and despair, in short.

in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

@zakalwe @joeinwynnewood @roblosricos @levitte @RegGuy I think you're overlooking something critical here and thus being perhaps too harsh.

Fight for whom? With what?

Literally everybody who has said they're "for the people" has lied. Literally everybody who has built up the kind of support to effect change has doubled down on the status quo. Remember when Obama, THE FIRST BLACK PRESIDENT!!!!1111!1!!11!oneone!!, was going to save all y'all?

Remember how he did fuck all?

Yeah.

Unknown parent

democrats trying to do something good, the GOP directly, purposefully and loudly fucking it up... but americans inexplicably blaming the democrats for that, is a tale as old as time
This entry was edited (5 months ago)
in reply to 🇨🇦🇩🇪🇨🇳张殿李🇨🇳🇩🇪🇨🇦

Again not wrong. "Hope and change", my ass. Ran as a progressive. Governed as a middle-of-the-road establishment guy. He did get us the ACA, to be fair. And told insurance companies they had to stop denying care for "pre-existing" conditions. But we SHOULD have gotten single-payer.

Again to be fair, Obama's plan (which actually Mitt Romney originated most of, iirc) originally had a single-payer "public option". It was the GOP that killed it and drove a stake through its heart.

in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

@zakalwe @joeinwynnewood @roblosricos @levitte @RegGuy I'm not saying "stop fighting". I'm saying that the current battle in the current battlefield is a lost cause. The system cannot be changed from within. It has a powerful immune system that attacks change, even if beneficial. (It has autoimmune disorder.)

It's time to look for new strategies, new battlegrounds, with fresh troops who have new ideas rather than doing the political equivalent of WWI trench warfare.

in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

@zakalwe @joeinwynnewood @roblosricos @levitte @RegGuy I named Obama for a very specific reason.

For two years he held ALL the reins: the House, the Senate, the Court, and, obviously, the Presidency.

What did he do in those two years?

You can't count on the Democrats to save you. They've demonstrated time and again they won't ever save anybody who's not a billionaire. They only back a slightly different set of billionaires than the Repugnicans.

in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

@zakalwe @joeinwynnewood @roblosricos @levitte @RegGuy What I have in mind as the inevitable outcome of what's going on is unfortunately something I hope to die before seeing.

Because this is no longer salvageable in my opinion and will lead to blood.

Lots of it.

And I genuinely don't want to be around when it happens. Because I've read history. I know what it looks like. And it ain't pretty.

Unknown parent

the netherlands just rejected bigot wilders

poland rejected duda and his anti-lgbt bs

brazil chose lula over bolsonaro

heck even the usa chose biden over trump

etc

the point is a country can veer right, and then back

but you want to sell the lie trump is already mussolini and hitler

he WANTS to be mussolini and hitler

and he will be, if people of whiny spineless premature capitulation to fear prevail via not voting

This entry was edited (5 months ago)
in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

throughout history fascists have never once respected democracy. hitler got power democratically, yes, but he almost immediately set about dismantling it by passing laws against forming new parties, and sending his political prisoners to concentration camps.

there was also no democracy under mussolini, and franco couped the democratically elected socialist party in spain.

connect the dots, it's really not that hard.

in reply to 🇨🇦🇩🇪🇨🇳张殿李🇨🇳🇩🇪🇨🇦

so you're with the revolution scenario

which of course is hell, and anyone looking forward to it is a fuckwit

do you mind me arguing to vote?

perhaps i'm an idiot because americans are lazy morons who whine and don't vote, and to get effective change we need to sustain, and spineless airhead americans can't do that

well i'm going to try to push it anyways

you're free to shake your head

This entry was edited (5 months ago)
Unknown parent

@zakalwe @joeinwynnewood @roblosricos @levitte @ZDL @RegGuy

and that's part of the problem:

the people talking up revolution are whiny quitters

that doesn't win revolutions

they lack the iota of intestinal fortitude it takes to vote, because it hurts their precious fee fees

so they're throwing their lot in with fucking bloody revolution and what that takes in conviction and sustained effort?

the cosplayers will fold under a light breeze

it's a fucking joke

in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

I don't read those comments as "with the revolution scenario". I read them as "this has passed the tipping point of where it's possible to fix it again without a lot of spilled blood."

And I dread that too.

We could probably still do it if more of America showed signs of even caring.

in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

@holdenweb @mloxton @admin @john @ShredderFeeder yes, language barriers are undeniably a factor in conception - even amongst native speakers of the same nation. I was irritated, because I never had heard someone saying "Gavin is an attractive choice" or "Obama was an attractive candidate" "or Clinton was a really atractive candidate". I talk a lot about politics with ppl from many different countries - this struck me just the way it did. ;-)
Unknown parent

thank you

so i'll make you a deal:

we both vote

then if the fascist fuckers show up in washington dc or elsewhere with violence when they lose (assuming enough of us vote), i'll stand there with you to meet them in kind

deal?

and yes the system is fucked

*because not enough fucking vote*

This entry was edited (5 months ago)
in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

we're talking about a person who has shown repeated disdain for the constitution and laws, and yes he's been pushed back by judges which is good, but to that he's just threatened to incite the insurrection act after he didn't get his way with chicago, so who really knows how much power the judges have?

and ICE has been given multiple orders by the courts, and has not followed a single one of them, they've kept on doing what they've been doing, and they haven't seen any consequences for that either.

so yes, some small incremental change is trying to happen. that's better than nothing.

keep in mind though, that even if elections do happen, who's to say they won't just storm the capitol again and put trump back in? these people don't respect democracy, they don't respect peace, and that includes peaceful protests.

maybe you're right, maybe we can vote the guy out, but i personally don't hold much hope for it.

and regardless, the whole american system is fucked, so it'd be a bit stupid just to go back to how everything was.

in reply to Ilka 🌐

well said

furthermore, "that's just the way it is" is no defense

our language choices should be more precise, and those of us who care should try to choose our words more carefully

not just because of potential miscommunication, but simply because more precise is more precise: we communicate better

This entry was edited (5 months ago)
Unknown parent

@zakalwe @joeinwynnewood @roblosricos @levitte @ZDL @RegGuy

😆

but maga turds can wear a mask just fine: just look at ICE

a mask is fine for them when it's hiding from the repercussions of their fascism

but a mask is not fine when it prevents them from killing their own grandmother

in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

Like all of these MAGA Valiant Defenders Of The Free World And The American Dream who can't mask up in a global pandemic because they're such pussies they can't breathe properly with a surgical mask on.

If you can't walk around the the grocery store in a surgical mask, how are you going to fight in an NBC suit, you muppet?

in reply to mae :blobcatmlem:

If they lose another election and storm the capitol again, I'm good with meeting them with live fire this time tbh.
in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

@zakalwe @joeinwynnewood @roblosricos @levitte @RegGuy I would be disappointed if you didn't. Let me put my (historical) cards on the table.

The USA is not in a "Seize Mai" state here. What's going on here is far more profound: the sclerotic rigidity of late-era Han. The upheaval that's coming is not The Troubles to be put to bed with the Good Friday Agreement.

You're headed for the Yellow Turbans.

With that I've just sent a chill down the spines of any reader of Chinese history.

in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

@zakalwe @joeinwynnewood @roblosricos @levitte @RegGuy I hope you're not numbering me among those talking up revolution?

'Cause I thought I was clear that I dread the forthcoming orgy of blood. (It won't be a revolution. It will be the Yellow Turbans. That's far more chilling.)

in reply to 🇨🇦🇩🇪🇨🇳张殿李🇨🇳🇩🇪🇨🇦

yeah

a rot so deep it's beyond addressing coherently, and perhaps even beyond comprehension

i feel that

maybe it's time for the usa's century of humiliation

it's kind of funny how the last century was dominated by ussr/ usa

and now both countries (well russia and usa) are laughingstock basketcases

hubris, pride

it's a hell of a thing

colossal blindness

This entry was edited (5 months ago)
in reply to 🇨🇦🇩🇪🇨🇳张殿李🇨🇳🇩🇪🇨🇦

no i didn't think so

your trepidation over that outcome, unlike so many other fools yearning for it, i got that

This entry was edited (5 months ago)
Unknown parent

@zakalwe @joeinwynnewood @roblosricos @levitte @RegGuy (And you're right. It's *not* a pleasant analogy. It's one that terrifies the shit out of me. It's why I want to be dead before it happens. This is not something I can watch while chomping down on popcorn, unlike the shenanigans going on now.)
in reply to 🇨🇦🇩🇪🇨🇳张殿李🇨🇳🇩🇪🇨🇦

Not a pleasant analogy but ... honestly, I'd be a liar if I said I thought you were wrong. It's totally in the cards, though I don't think it would go that long in the modern age. Then again if things really do go completely to hell... I could absolutely see large parts of the US going full Hundred Warlords.
Unknown parent

😆

i'm just glad i got to be Phoenix Wright

This entry was edited (5 months ago)
Unknown parent

Unknown parent

Grassroots Joe

@Wyatt_H_Knott

Great. Next step is helping increase the number of people commited to voting in every election and helping them expand that universe further.

Network effects can be very powerful IF we work at leveraging them.

IMHO, learning about and using the race-class-gender narrative framework in all of our political and quasi-political conversations makes the task much easier to accomplish.

I put together a curriculum of sorts at https://docs.google.com/document/d/16wE1lysyAkK-17wiMuMXR5O40iOAPV6469x3WHVmpoE/edit?usp=drivesdk

@benroyce @bobdobberson

in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

@zakalwe @joeinwynnewood @roblosricos @levitte @RegGuy You mean the last century wasn't humiliating enough? 🤣 I mean c'mon! All y'all had disco, mullets, Reaganomics, low-rise pants, zoot suits, Miami Vice, etc. etc. etc. in the last century. Wasn't that humiliating enough!?
in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

@zakalwe @joeinwynnewood @roblosricos @levitte @RegGuy Taiping was just a crazy who collected a bunch more crazies at a time of discontent. Most people in the empire didn't believe in them, but it's key to point out: they had a belief. The Yellow Turbans had no belief except that the system was irredeemable and needed to be torn down. Taiping was personal delusion and self-aggrandizing that spawned believing followers. Yellow Turbans were just raw destruction.
in reply to Seán Fenian

@zakalwe @joeinwynnewood @roblosricos @levitte @RegGuy I very much hope I'm wrong. The problem is that I have a track record of being right way more often than I am wrong when it comes to these kinds of things. It's the old Cassandra Curse. I warn people (employers or nations, doesn't matter) about what's about to happen. I get ignored. It happens. Then I'm asked "well, what do you recommend?!"

"I RECOMMEND, MOTHERFUCKER, YOU BUILD A TIME MACHINE, GO BACK, AND TAKE ME SERIOUSLY!"

in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

Cola wars? I am one hundred percent with the Big Bald Jamaican Dude from the 7-Up ad.

"Fo' me, Coke isn't de real t'ing. Pepsi doesn't have my taste fo' life. And frankly? I nevah really WANTED to be a Peppah." 😂

This entry was edited (5 months ago)
in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

@zakalwe @joeinwynnewood @roblosricos @levitte @RegGuy By which you mean "I actually read it".

I mean if the current people trying to use public rage as a tool to gain power read history, they'd understand that once that powder keg's fuse is lit, NOBODY is safe, **LEAST OF ALL THEM**.

The Han court learned that. The French nobility learned that, as did those who thought to use the French Revolution for their personal gain.

To name two examples of hundreds.

in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

@zakalwe @joeinwynnewood @roblosricos @levitte @ZDL @RegGuy Republicans always have and always will define anything that is for the ‘public good’ as Socialism or Communism. Money for health care, food stamps and housing is not Socialism, it’s charity. The GOP has been successful in redefining charity as bad but tax cuts for the rich as good.
Unknown parent

it's a very cogent insight by ZDL

i'm stuck in this silo of thinking about the left fighting MAGA, who are busy licking the butts of plutocrats

what didn't occur to me is if MAGA wakes up from its zombie stupor

they certainly don't magically become left

but ZDL is right that if that comes to pass, that waking up will unleash a fountain of rage on their former billionaire god emperors

the left is practically completely sidelined by that rage fountain drama

This entry was edited (5 months ago)
in reply to 🇨🇦🇩🇪🇨🇳张殿李🇨🇳🇩🇪🇨🇦

@ZDL
I was just talking today about how much I’d rather be a Rockefeller in the 50s and 60s than an aristocrat (or Russian oligarch). And yet how our billionaires seem to craaaaave the latter and are terrified of being the former.
Unknown parent

in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

@minmi And now we've moved from "How do we beat the other team?" to "What do we do when the league collapses and the teams and their fans riot?"
Unknown parent

Nobody has one single tiny iota of a problem with people who can't vote

Obviously the topic is losers who can vote but choose not to

In fact, if anyone wants disenfranchised people to be able to vote, they would fucking vote to get that change

This entry was edited (5 months ago)
in reply to Objectionodon

@objectionodon @bobdobberson @joeinwynnewood @Wyatt_H_Knott Not everyone is ALLOWED to vote in the US. Example: Every GOP state has voter ID. Enough people don't have ID's and enough of them hate the GOP that Voter ID gives the GOP a roughly 5% permanent advantage in every state that has it.
Unknown parent

@LukefromDC @Wyatt_H_Knott

Right

And we wouldn't have to fucking play real life call of duty with maga goons if enough whiny nonvoting assholes had fucking voted in the first place

So next election are we going to be having this conversation again about the next fascist maneuver? Or will enough nonvoting shitbags finally learn their lesson?

Unknown parent

LukefromDC
@Wyatt_H_Knott When ICE is only the block trying to put the cuffs on your neighbors, it's way too late to try to vote them away. What works for this scenario is the whole neighborhood swarming out and counterattacking ICE. ICE has cut and run over and over again when faced with determined and physical resistance.
Unknown parent

More exactly, participation

Nonparticipation consists of doing nothing, then whining you don't get what you want

The entitlement of modern alienation

This entry was edited (5 months ago)
Unknown parent

Pope Bob the Unsane

NO... REALLY... JUST VOTE!!!! That's all you need to do!!! JUST VOTE!!!!

@LukefromDC @joeinwynnewood @Wyatt_H_Knott

in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

voting, itself, is not a bad thing.

If that is the only thing, you lose.

Also, mad props to Whargarbbbl.

Voting, in my opinion, is useless.

Build your community. Bring your neighbors together. Vote LOCALLY (absolutely), but beyond local is lost. Until we fix local.

@LukefromDC @joeinwynnewood @Wyatt_H_Knott

in reply to Pope Bob the Unsane

Nobody in a million years thinks you only have to vote

Nobody in a million years said that's all you have to do

It is the most predictable insipid dishonest reply to the call to vote

This entry was edited (5 months ago)
Unknown parent

@bobdobberson @LukefromDC @joeinwynnewood @Wyatt_H_Knott well yes, as i get to know more of pope bob I'm feeling increasingly annoyed
Unknown parent

Yes I'm very family with this fear and cowardice. They want to cancel elections, and therefore you believe they already achieved that. It's called premature capitulation: malice announces its intentions, and you obediently submit to what they want like a sycophant. It is the epitome of weakness. What purpose do you think you are serving with these embarrassing weak words?
This entry was edited (5 months ago)
in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

@Wyatt_H_Knott Question now is will there even BE a next election with two or more candidates able to win each of the major offices.

You can't vote if they cancel the election, and if only one candidate or one party is permitted to effectively compete, you are not really being allowed to vote either.

Unknown parent

@bobdobberson @LukefromDC @joeinwynnewood @Wyatt_H_Knott I do peer with my neighbors. I also enjoy being a jackass. Do you desire to peer with a neighbor such as myself with such a proclivity?
Unknown parent

@LukefromDC @Wyatt_H_Knott

the problem is the level of commitment and sustained effort and suffering you are referring to is not well recommended by the weak character of the typical spineless whiny nonvoter

Voting is merely the same motivation delivered easier. Anyone who truly understands the nature of what you are talking about immensely prefers voting

So you're not talking about revolutionaries

Youre talking about pathetic cosplayers

in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

@Wyatt_H_Knott Since we have to assume they will cancel the elections, WE have to prepare to stop the Nazis by other means.

This is not Call of Duty-but it is the call of duty...

Unknown parent

Pope Bob the Unsane

shit, no, I lost it, but I found Ellie Goulding... So whwatever...

@miguelpergamon @LukefromDC @joeinwynnewood @Wyatt_H_Knott

Unknown parent

Pope Bob the Unsane

I think you may have inspired the next music track for #DrunkBobDJ after this... ... It's on the tip of my tongue... but this post is... .. maybe I can find it... ... I think I can...

We'll see...

@miguelpergamon @LukefromDC @joeinwynnewood @Wyatt_H_Knott

Unknown parent

@miguelpergamon @bobdobberson @LukefromDC @joeinwynnewood @Wyatt_H_Knott

i'm sorry i dropped my stack of punch cards, let me get back to you

no i'm not avoiding you

i'm not avoiding you

sorry gotta run!

Unknown parent

quangobaud
@bobdobberson @LukefromDC @joeinwynnewood @Wyatt_H_Knott
How do you feel about standing me up in 1966, Ben? (You were seeing that IBM hussy, weren't you!?)
Unknown parent

quangobaud

@bobdobberson @LukefromDC @joeinwynnewood @Wyatt_H_Knott

Eliza enters the chat and repeats what people say.

How do you feel about Eliza entering the chat and repeating what people say?

🥸

Unknown parent

Pope Bob the Unsane

your enjoyment always expresses as being a 'jackass'?

@LukefromDC @joeinwynnewood @Wyatt_H_Knott

Unknown parent

Pope Bob the Unsane

what is the purpose or function of being a jackass?

@LukefromDC @joeinwynnewood @Wyatt_H_Knott

Unknown parent

Pocoyo is Spanish. Do you like tapas?
This entry was edited (5 months ago)
in reply to Pope Bob the Unsane

given the ignorance of this question, I might assume you do exhibit as a 'jackass' in meat-space.

How does that serve you? How does that exhibit? What does a jack-ass in the 'real-world' look like? Should it be seen as a role-model?

@LukefromDC @joeinwynnewood @Wyatt_H_Knott

in reply to Pope Bob the Unsane

@bobdobberson @LukefromDC @joeinwynnewood @Wyatt_H_Knott

you do

we're sharing an intimate shitposting session on mastodon

we might as well be married

could you turn off the bathroom light please?

Unknown parent

Pope Bob the Unsane

I mean, if I'm honest, curious.

It makes me feel curious.

What do you want to seemingly hide from me? Why would sharing that somehow hurt you? Is that the concern? Am I projecting? Who knows.

Love,

Bob

@LukefromDC @joeinwynnewood @Wyatt_H_Knott

in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

@bobdobberson @LukefromDC @joeinwynnewood @Wyatt_H_Knott

How does Eliza feel about love-rat Ben's betrayal, Eliza?

I don't know, Eliza, but I've begun talking to myself, Eliza.

How does us talking to ourselves make us feel, Eliza?

Unknown parent

thank you for your wall of text

you vote

always

if you don't, everything you're worried about you are accepting and welcoming

"no i'm not"

you frame the enemy of your rights as all powerful and never defeatable

you are a victim of your own cowardice and cynicism

you think exactly how those who want to oppress you want you to think

This entry was edited (5 months ago)
Unknown parent

LukefromDC

@weyoun6 @Wyatt_H_Knott COMPETITIVE elections is another matter. With enough gerrymandering all seats can be rendered uncompetitive. Outright voter suppression could include ICE at the polls, "motor vehicle safety inspections" on roads between polling places and GOP-unfriendly neighborhoods (which has been done before) and even fake "PSA's" claiming warrants will be checked at polling places.

There's an old quote from Stalin that applies here: "it's not who votes that counts, it's who counts the votes." Cheating in elections no longer requires openly stuffing ballot boxes.

Then there is the issue of the "opposition party" not really opposing. Lots of the machine Trump is now using was built under Biden and even Obama. Going back to GW Bush every President has deported more people than his predecessor, Biden in particular being a notorious example earning the name "Deporter in Chief."

At any rate, one of the things that got us here was the Dems pulling the football away from progressive voters over and over again. Another was Biden sending his base home by fully endorsing Netanyahu's genocide in Occupied Palestine. Both of these "blackpilled" tens of millions of voters, breaking their morale and sending them home

Finally, Trump knows if he ever leaves power without leaving a handpicked successor in power he will go straight to prison. This time around it will NOT be the 2021-2023 slow-walk. Trump and all his top scum like Stephen Miller will be indicted and held without bond, possibly under Supermax conditions.

If National Guard occupations of cities blow up into battles with even a few hundred dead, outright Nuremburg style war crimes trials would be on the table.

Trump will do whatever he deems necessary to avoid all this. We stay nonviolent, he will make up his own excuse to start the civil war himself, then he has a much better chance of cancelling an election or just pulling another J6, this time knowing what he is doing.

Trump II is NOT a normal presidency. the Old Republic is dead. He is defying some courts and getting favorable rulings from handpicked judges in others , notably the Supreme Court. Now he is probably using the "shutdown" to wrest control of the budget away from Congress entirely. Notice ICE is not shut down.

CONCENTRATION CAMPS are now up and running, and nobody ever voted one of those away. Trump is an open Nazi, and he is doing the things that Nazis do.

Unknown parent

@weyoun6 @LukefromDC @Wyatt_H_Knott there will be elections

Anyone who says otherwise is working a learned helplessness trollfarm agenda or is a victim of it

in reply to LukefromDC

@LukefromDC @Wyatt_H_Knott I think it's unlikely they will cancel elections. First, it's difficult to do. Second, they don't have to cancel elections to stay in power. One could argue that the remedy for canceled elections are not so different than those for a coup. My concern in asserting that elections will be cancelled is that I don't want to set a standard that elections being held means things are okay.
Unknown parent

that's awesome

so the real reason you put down voting is because you look forward to violence

just fucking vote

if it comes to violence, we'll deal with it

until then we fucking avoid it

scattered violence is normal

mass violence is not like a fucking tacticool movie. it's fucking hell

This entry was edited (5 months ago)
in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

@weyoun6 @Wyatt_H_Knott

I spend a decade in DC 1989-1999 bottomlining physical defense of the "P st Beach" Gay cruising area. I trained my dates in basic rough ground defense tactics, mostly about light/shadow/cover/concealment and that sort of stuff. All shit I learned from common Army handbooks. I led in person when I was there and shit happened, but the fact that I didn't do this solo meant the fight went on when I was elsewhere too,

The result was a string of defeats for the US Park Police trying to arrrest us for using these dark woods for our purposes at night.

We held P St Beach for a decade against the entire strength of the US Park Police, rarely with more than 15 insurgents on any one night.

Neither legalizing woods cruising nor legalizing "backroom" Gay bars was ever on any ballot. Yet every Gay man using the woods was a vote for "Cops out."

No, I didn't learn to fight playing fucking video games. "No-Go zones" remain an objective and speciality of mine. Today the idea is to create no-go zones for ICE, like people are doing in every occupied city today,

When I got my degree in government and politics back in 1994, I remarked that my specialties are "extra-parliamentary opposition, counter-law enforcement, and insurgency warfare."

The war in El Salvador and Reagan's failed attempt to bring back the draft to support a conventional forces invasion there were what brought me into politics.

Unknown parent

@alexadeswift @evoluxa I know a little about this. Germany also has tax payments for religious affiliations? Strange to an American. Im not judging, it's just alien to me
in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

> poland rejected duda and his anti-lgbt bs

Imma gonna stop you right there.

Duda's two terms have ended, so he couldn't be eligible to run anyway.

Poland has chosen the far-right candidate, Nawrocki. A part of this was because the other right-wing party (PO) decided that issues of Poles expressed in the surveys were not real by the party higher-ups.
Instead they opted for mimicking the far-right hate »

@nowayitsmae @zakalwe @joeinwynnewood @levitte @roblosricos @RegGuy

in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

People who's main political driver isn't ideology vote for their self-interest.

That's why Madmani is so successful. This is why Democrats paved the way for Trump.

Until this is understood asking to vote is like asking to pray: voting will make you feel good and you won't need to lift a finger doing anything else.

in reply to Dźwiedziu

@dzwiedziu yes we need to do more than vote. It's always voting as a supplement, never voting as all you have to do. What's silly is doing everything else and not voting. That's self-destruction
Unknown parent

yeah I think i read nawrocki is going against the wishes of his own party on lgbt and getting not as harsh as duda but still harsh. Is that correct? And sorry for misrepresenting the situation with duda. I plead dumb american
This entry was edited (5 months ago)
Unknown parent

Dźwiedziu

« and reproductive rights.

So this is how much Poland got from the electoral process: more wanking from the (faux)fash and more fash.

And this is including the votes from people voting in their self-interest of those 70% promises wanked away publicly.

(With the notable exception of empowering the most radical mainstream furthest-left-wing party, the Razem socdems.)

@nowayitsmae @zakalwe @joeinwynnewood @levitte @roblosricos @RegGuy

Unknown parent

Dźwiedziu

« fash-parroting.

Today the current PM is sliding out of reality so fast that he tells that he implemented 30 of 100 promises because he had 30% of the vote (and he's being a smug wanker that his math checks out) and replying with almost a “fuck you” to young women who were asking him about the still lacking prospects of having a house.

And the lacking 70% votes, apologies, promises? They included housing, LGBTQ+ »

@nowayitsmae @zakalwe @joeinwynnewood @levitte @roblosricos @RegGuy

in reply to Dźwiedziu

« against LGBTQ, migrants (including Ukrainians, who became one of the main scapegoats in fash propaganda), “woke”.

Thus the Poles sliding far-right have chosen the fash instead of (faux)fash.

An this was a second time that Trzaskowski lost to the further right presidental candidate because he had nothing to offer besides not being the other party. Which was such a thin veil the second time with all the »

@nowayitsmae @zakalwe @joeinwynnewood @levitte @roblosricos @RegGuy @benroyce

in reply to Seán Fenian

@zakalwe @joeinwynnewood @roblosricos @levitte @ZDL@mstdn.social @RegGuy it wasn't just the GOP that killed the public option. It was racist, right-wing Democrats like Joe Lieberman. They did the same to everything else Obama tried to do. Yet you blame Obama for being too right-wing and are silent about those racist white Dems(who are still very much here starting at the voter level):

https://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/newsletter-article/senate-democrats-drop-public-option-woo-lieberman-and-liberals-howl

in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

@zakalwe @joeinwynnewood @roblosricos @levitte @RegGuy he's not just one individual. He represents a big, toxic group of Democratic voters who share the bigotry & hatred of Republicans to a tremendous degree.
in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

@holdenweb @mloxton @admin @john @ShredderFeeder indeed, I agree :-) I love language & enjoy learning, like in this case. Precision is a tool to navigate a narrative - some languages in their base are more percise than others, which sometimes makes communication very delicate. Diplomacy lives from this precision - I thought Trudeau was 1 of the best diplomatic & precise speakers, I think Macron is too. Maybe juggling 2 very different languages (french & english) helped to be excellent.
Unknown parent

@admin @MennoWolff @tregeagle @john @ShredderFeeder

1. the democrats suck
2. we are in an fptp voting system. 3rd party vote divides the left and guarantees a maga win. that's not my opinion, that's not due to corruption, that's just math

thus the only path forward is to take over the democratic party

3rd party only helps maga

3rd party in the usa is folly until we get ranked choice voting

i want viable 3rd party

i hate the 2 party system

but i live in reality

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duverger%27s_law

Unknown parent

SlightlyCyberpunk

@MennoWolff @tregeagle @john @ShredderFeeder Love how folks are so captured by Dem propaganda that any talk of voting for someone else gets interpreted as not voting at all. I'm talking about building a new party that will actually represent working class interests. How do you think that's gonna happen without voting?

Just don't think voting *by itself* or voting *for the same assholes that are already running things* is going to change much. It won't.

Unknown parent

@AeonCypher @alexadeswift @evoluxa

which makes it all the more important that those who can vote do vote. to move in the direction, at least, to bring back voting rights for those who don't have them

Unknown parent

not only is your observation insightful, it is what happened

MAGA cannibalized the GOP

MAGA calling people "RINO" was a big thing ("republican in name only")

it was calling out a republican for being centrist, and thus "unpure" according to the zombie MAGAs. i say "was" because MAGA finished the purge

the left needs to do the same with the democrats

that's hard. but MAGA did it

3rd party meanwhile is suicide for the left

This entry was edited (5 months ago)
in reply to C. R. Collins 🌳 🐸

@crcollins

Yes, #RankedChoiceVoting would help. It would permit a left third party to compete in elections without helping right wing parties. In an election with more than two candidates, ranked choice is the one voting system most likely to produce the correct result, which is the candidate supported by the most people.

This is why Republicans are on record opposing ranked choice. They want minority rule.

@benroyce @admin @MennoWolff @tregeagle @john @ShredderFeeder

in reply to C. R. Collins 🌳 🐸

@crcollins @admin @MennoWolff @tregeagle @john @ShredderFeeder

ranked choice allows you to vote your conscience free and clear, without dreary strategy that kills the soul

3rd parties would flourish and be stable

when you vote, you rank your favorite party 1st, then the dreary democrat 2nd as a fallback, and not worry about sabotaging the vote and allowing MAGA to win

how do we get it?

we vote for dem candidates (some dems oppose it, all GOP opposes it)

it's creeping in in a few places

Unknown parent

@admin @crcollins @MennoWolff @tregeagle @john @ShredderFeeder

we already have ranked choice in some places. some dems support it, all GOP opposes it as of 2024 (they put out a national statement against it)

it is the only way you're going to get 3rd parties that are stable and viable

voting 3rd party *before* ranked choice simply means you help MAGA win. then we'll never get ranked choice

so we vote for dems who support it

only dems

and we better fucking show up

3rd party is suicide, now

in reply to C. R. Collins 🌳 🐸

@crcollins @MennoWolff @tregeagle @john @ShredderFeeder Ranked choice would definitely be great, but you won't see the major parties supporting it any time soon since it only weakens their position. Some states can do that through ballot initiatives I think, but not all have such a process.

Of course, the other thing to remember is that many parts of the country don't really have a functional two party system -- they basically only have one right now. Around here it's pretty common to have the Democrats be the only candidate running -- and they *still* struggle to get more than 75% of the vote! :)

We're not gonna win the presidency tomorrow, for sure, but about 2/3 of the races for my state legislature went unopposed in the last election. That's where we need better options. And you can't argue that this is just gonna hand a win to MAGA in races where the Republicans aren't even running!

in reply to BlueDot🇺🇦

@BlueDot @crcollins @admin @MennoWolff @tregeagle @john @ShredderFeeder

In addition to ranked choice voting, I have always believed this country should pull an Australia (and many others), and make voting mandatory. You can abstain if you want, but you have to show up to do so. You have to fill out a ballot and select all the abstain options.

But you can bet your bottom dollar the GOP will hate this idea, too.

Also, voting should be a two day affair, with mandatory time off guaranteed for all employed persons so everyone can find time to fulfill their civic duty, while not forcing everyone to be off work at the same time.

in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

It was used in the London UK mayoral elections until the conservatives in parliament banned it - basically no conservative mayor was ever going to get elected again so they had to eliminate a system that didn't work for them.

my fav variant of ranked choice also allows for a blank 1st choice signalling that no candidate really does it for you, but as a 2nd choice I'll pick X. I've never had the experience of it, but some on fedi has it in their local jurisdiction.

@crcollins @admin @MennoWolff @tregeagle @john @ShredderFeeder

Unknown parent

@the5thColumnist @steverocky @admin @MennoWolff @tregeagle @john @ShredderFeeder

you can do all that comparing that you want. but it's an academic exercise, not a useful one

the point is improving the usa, right?

so what value is in "both parties suck" exactly?

a voter is faced with a choice of two directions

ideally sustaining and iterating to better

meanwhile saying the choice doesn't matter just destroys the path forward. it's a gateway to lazy cynicism, which is a gateway to acceptance

Unknown parent

@steverocky @admin @MennoWolff @tregeagle @john @ShredderFeeder

Up until now at least, America has always considered itself a western democracy. So for matters of politcal comparison it should be compared to other western democracies.

in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

@crcollins @admin @MennoWolff @tregeagle @john @ShredderFeeder We have it in Oakland, CA. I agree 100% that this is the right way to go. Right now, it takes days and days to find out who won. I'm sure that can be improved, but it is important that it be improved. Not knowing who won is problematic and fuels opposition to ranked choice voting. But, despite that, it's way better at exposing what matters to voters.
in reply to Howard Cohen

@hoco @crcollins @admin @MennoWolff @tregeagle @john @ShredderFeeder

that should be able to be improved

it is true tabulating ranked choice is far more intensive than tabulating fptp

but we're not living in an age of people sitting at tables, we have computers

is there something i don't understand? like: there's a lot of confusing ballots that need manual intervention? are people writing "2" with a trailing line and it might be a "3"?

in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

@crcollins @admin @MennoWolff @tregeagle @john @ShredderFeeder I don't know what causes the delay. But, I have faith that smart people can improve it. And, to me, the delay is better than a fast decision between two candidates. However, I am weird. So, I know I'm not a good indicator of popular opinion.
Unknown parent

"well maybe if i just lie in this pile of maggots i'll somehow develop the will to keep fighting for life"

what?

developing vitality and vigor and the will to fight through resignation and cynicism?

all that happens is MAGA gets more and more powerful and then there's no ability to choose

you fight. every day. that's the only way

what you're articulating is acceptance. in effect if not intention

This entry was edited (5 months ago)
in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

@PatrickoftheG @admin @tregeagle @john @ShredderFeeder
Exactly. Until the voting system changes drastically, not voting, or voting for another party only helps the other side. Especially if that side is actively suppressing votes.
For the US, voting for the lesser evil seems smart, at least until you can fix the system.
I'm from the Netherlands. We have proportional representation. That means that in yesterday's election there were 27 parties participating.
1/2
in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

@the5thColumnist @steverocky @admin @MennoWolff @tregeagle @john @ShredderFeeder

The Dems for sure need fixing.
The party has for all intents and purposes been taken over to a large degree by craven corporate lackeys, whose real loyalty is to their corporate donors and AIPAC.

That needs to be changed.

But the only way to change it is through grass roots involvement.

Shouting about it won't help, because the US media is also run by craven corporate lackeys, whose real loyalty is to their corporate donors and AIPAC.

in reply to Androcat

exactly

1. 3rd party divides the left in our rotten fptp voting system, and thus is political suicide

2. the current democrats are spineless milquetoast corrupt corporate lackeys

so the only way forward is to take over the democratic party

but too many americans instead choose whiny lazy cynicism and disengagement, which they apparently don't understand is just a form of acceptance

This entry was edited (5 months ago)
Unknown parent

if you fight you may lose

if you don't fight you will lose

are you listening, whiny ass Americans?

This entry was edited (5 months ago)
in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

"if you don't vote, you get the government you deserve" was the lesson I always had growing up.

now, unfortunately even if you do vote, you may not get the gov't you want, but at least you didn't sit it out only to then complain afterwards that it didn't work out the way you wanted it.

@androcat @the5thColumnist @steverocky @admin @MennoWolff @tregeagle @john @ShredderFeeder

Unknown parent

i really have no problem running 3rd party in a safe dem district

but airhead people will glom onto this approach in unsafe districts

at best you have an extremely limited approach that applies to few races

at worst, what will happen is the GOP will gleefully jump in and help you, because they know what you don't know, or you know but refuse to accept out of pique:

you provide a way for the GOP to win

This entry was edited (5 months ago)
Unknown parent

SlightlyCyberpunk
@MennoWolff @PatrickoftheG @tregeagle @john @ShredderFeeder When I get my ballot, many -- possibly most -- races will only have a single choice. How is voting for someone else helping "the other side" when there is no "other side"? At the national level it's a duopoly, but that's not the case in every single race across the entire country. We have to vote strategically, and that means not making lazy assumptions that the thousand voter race for the local city council looks exactly the same as the hundred million voter race for the national president. If the only candidate is a corrupt nepo-baby Dem, we gotta run someone else. And if the local party stacks the deck against you, you run without them.
in reply to Menno

@PatrickoftheG @admin @tregeagle @john @ShredderFeeder
It will take at least 4 parties to form a majority. But some are polar opposites, so it's going to be a tough negotiation to get something going.
2/2
in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

@androcat @the5thColumnist @steverocky @admin @MennoWolff @tregeagle @john @ShredderFeeder The only sure path to victory in US politics is to take over *both* major parties. As the rich have done. As they vote with dollars rather than bodies, any grassroots movement that can move a lot of bodies could take them back. Since the (R) are the demographic nationalists this century, anyone who can pass as their own should infiltrate and crowd out the lazy unqualified MAGAs.
Unknown parent

@log @androcat @the5thColumnist @steverocky @admin @MennoWolff @tregeagle @john @ShredderFeeder again, getting a real left candidate across the primaries, because of corporate democrat resistance and whiny ass american nonvoters, is hard enough as it is. what you're asking for is to just coat all of Manhattan in diamonds to save on electricity. You have to speak in feasibility, not empty wishes
Unknown parent

Log 🪵

@androcat @the5thColumnist @steverocky @admin @MennoWolff @tregeagle @john @ShredderFeeder Crowd out the candidates, and the voters can't choose a MAGA.

This is the lesson of AIPAC. Pay all the candidates in both parties to unquestioningly support Israel, and the policy of the US will be to support Israel. If you own both parties, you always win. If you own both parties, everything you do gets the "bipartisan compromise" credential.

in reply to Log 🪵

@log

You only need one of them.

The rich needed to control both because they wanted to prevent taxation of their assets.

The Magats are completely mind-controlled by the entertainment media known as faux news. It is unlikely that they can be crowded out.

@benroyce @the5thColumnist @steverocky @admin @MennoWolff @tregeagle @john @ShredderFeeder

in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

@androcat @the5thColumnist @steverocky @admin @MennoWolff @tregeagle @john @ShredderFeeder But I *do* want a unicorn for Christmas. And a cavalry saddle.

The (R) are now in a position where they are refusing to seat a rep-elect, solely because one more vote could force a vote on revealing Epstein accomplices. *Any* weakening of the (R) vote-in-lockstep discipline forces more horse trading and log rolling.

in reply to Log 🪵

and i want a buddhist at the synod of bishops in the vatican

about the same chance of happening as "sneaking" a nonMAGA into the GOP house

This entry was edited (5 months ago)
Unknown parent

"some non-MAGA Republicans, are not ideologically racist"

no

"i have nazis over to my house, i make excuses for them, and i fall silent when they commit violence, but i'm totally innocent"

yeah fuck that bullshit and fuck the GOP

This entry was edited (5 months ago)
in reply to Jones Murphy

@jonesmurphy @zakalwe @roblosricos @levitte @RegGuy

I've been trying to find the right place to jump in again, and maybe this is it, maybe, not.
Either way here's the thing, that big toxic group of voters, some Democrats, some independents, some non-MAGA Republicans, are not ideologically racist.
They *have* accepted as true a long list of racist and also anti-semitic, homophobic, transphobic and xenophobic tropes because the regressive-right has very effectively sold them, and ...

in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

There's a huge difference between a Nazi and someone who, having only what they hear said all around them to go by, have accepted what they have heard over and over and over again as true.

The difference is also extremely important, because there's zero chance of getting a Nazi to believe something different, a much larger than zero chance of getting the others to believe something different if you can change what they hear. ...

This entry was edited (5 months ago)
in reply to Grassroots Joe

I believe everything you wrote is bullshit

It's not hard for a child of normal socialization and moral reasoning skills, nothing spectacular, to reflect on and easily reason that the attitudes around them are suspect

Bigotry is bigotry. There is no excuse. All bigots need to be ostracized and excoriated and nothing more. Enough of this "they just need a little understanding" crap. They're just stupid vile turds

This entry was edited (5 months ago)
in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

@jonesmurphy @zakalwe @roblosricos @levitte @RegGuy

I think you may have to own some bullshit here. People don't reflect on 2nd order implications of what they do. Call it self delusion or whatever you like, but it is what it is. People look at their personal actions and stop at "I haven't done outwardly racist things, I'm not a racist."

Beyond that is a big pile of cognitive research into how people receive & process information; it's unfortunately rarely a rational process.
...

Unknown parent

I read your critique of their cognition and I agree with it

But while you find the details excusing I find them more damning

There is a deeper decision point that is culpable here: "I am fine with degrading other people on shallow aspects of their identity"

Everything else is just window dressing

I think you damn them even further by describing the dimness of their cognition

They're just shitbags

That's it

Fuck bigots

This entry was edited (5 months ago)
Unknown parent

Grassroots Joe

@jonesmurphy @zakalwe @roblosricos @levitte @RegGuy

benefit them and people who don't look like them, you're going to have to get over this hump.

There's no path if every eligible voter who believe themselves to not be racist but is complicit at some level is written off as an unredeemable bigot.

in reply to Grassroots Joe

@jonesmurphy @zakalwe @roblosricos @levitte @RegGuy

There's no part of "a little understanding" in any of what I'm trying to get across. It's entirely about what works to move people out from under layers of cognitively effective dog-whistles & scapegoating and into solidarity with other middle/working class people who may look different but are really the same.

If you're serious about the goal of getting people to vote *and* vote for politicians/policies that ...

in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

@joeinwynnewood @jonesmurphy @zakalwe @roblosricos @levitte @RegGuy

Furthermore I see no path to redemption for them

Or rather, no obligation for you or I to reach out to people of such vicious intent. Why do we owe anything to people who create such harm in society?

Let them redeem themselves

All I see of our obligation to them is to reject them, ostracize them, despise them

Bigots are the toilet of humanity. We only improve society by walling them off

in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

@joeinwynnewood @zakalwe @roblosricos @levitte @RegGuy grassroots Joe is dead wrong about "difference between Nazis and Americans who vote GOP". The folks who elected Adolf Hitler were seemingly more liberal than the ones who elected FDR while conducting hard core Jim Crow and lynching blacks nonstop. US Jim Crow heavily inspired the Nazis of Europe:

https://www.history.com/articles/how-the-nazis-were-inspired-by-jim-crow

Unknown parent

@jonesmurphy @joeinwynnewood @zakalwe @roblosricos @levitte @RegGuy

i'm with you

i just... i can't handle bigotry

i think some people look at society, and think about healing divisions and wounds

what they don't understand is that some wounds and divisions are permanent

if someone denies reality on vaccines, russian imperialism, climate change, etc, this is not someone you sit down with and have a nice chat. this is an ignorant moron you sever all ties with

likewise with bigotry...

Unknown parent

Jones Murphy
@joeinwynnewood @zakalwe @roblosricos @levitte @RegGuy folks who are living lives centered on Nazi eugenics, inbreeding & color caste are not good decent people. They know better. They're constantly exposed to better and reject it. They're constantly exposed to diversity and reject it. This includes many on the left who posture as leftist perfectionists while making excuses for Nazi eugenics practitioners.
in reply to Jones Murphy

@joeinwynnewood @zakalwe @roblosricos @levitte @RegGuy we have a lot of folks today who describe genocide, slavery & apartheid (which inspired the European Holocaust) as #MAGA. Grassroots Joe believes that such horrible bigots are so numerous that we need to pander to them. Republicans know that this is not true, so for the last 12 years they've been rolling back the Voting Rights Act and increasingly suppressing the black vote.

https://www.npr.org/2025/10/15/nx-s1-5575101/scotus-voting-rights-arguments

in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

Where you got that?
Doing so would wreck his radical catholic base support. In a debate he used the pride flag to shame Trzaskowski and Rafał fell for it.

One example with a Grok-generated image, of RT with a pride flag, as RT wouldn't be caught dead with one:
hxxps://niezalezna[.]pl/polityka/nie-beda-mieli-zadnych-hamulcow-nawrocki-ostrzega-przed-skutkami-zwyciestwa-trzaskowskiego-wideo/540236
(Breaking the link »

@nowayitsmae @zakalwe @joeinwynnewood @levitte @roblosricos @RegGuy

Unknown parent

Jones Murphy
@joeinwynnewood @zakalwe @roblosricos @levitte @RegGuy you are absolutely correct. We have a large group of folks who are still very angry about Emancipation. They describe genocide, slavery & apartheid as #MAGA. Trump did best in those states which continue to celebrate Confederate Memorial Day, glorifying deserters, mutineers & traitors who killed more Americans than Hitler did back when populations were ten times lower. Trump just built a Confederate monument in DC.
in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

@jonesmurphy @joeinwynnewood @zakalwe @roblosricos @levitte @RegGuy

you're dealing with people whose entire essence is built on disrespect

you can't respect disrespect. there is no "healing wounds" rationale that will ever work with that

you simply exclude all ties with them, *and* you do your best to utterly exclude them from society

if someone considers that harsh?

do they consider the harshness of bigots?

bigots deserve what they give. and i'm happy to give it to them: 🖕

in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

@jonesmurphy @joeinwynnewood @zakalwe @roblosricos @levitte @RegGuy

what a bigot needs to do is change who they are

and that's not our job

no one can hold their hand and whisper sweet nothings in their ear and commiserate on their precious feelings about their need to hate

if they are going to change, they need to do it on their own time, and learn themselves what most morally normal people learn before the age of 10

if they can't do that?

fuck them forever

in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

@joeinwynnewood @zakalwe @roblosricos @levitte @RegGuy we need to get started on that ASAP.. Things are going back downhill fast. This is not a drill. Many people are making excuses for Confederates while pretending to be leftist perfectionists.
Unknown parent

@dzwiedziu @nowayitsmae @zakalwe @joeinwynnewood @levitte @roblosricos @RegGuy

again i plead dumb american. i open my ignorant mouth and speak on things i don't know

i apologize

and thanks for educating me

Unknown parent

The 1964 Civil Rights Act made the Dixiecrats, the racist southern democrats, feel "betrayed" by LBJ and so they began to migrate to the GOP

The racist south votes Republican now, not Democrat

You understand that right?

So are you lying or are you ignorant?

Do you have a path forward?

Or is this pointless hopeless "everything sucks" just you telling us you're fucking useless except for whining

This entry was edited (4 months ago)
Unknown parent

roblosricos

@jonesmurphy @joeinwynnewood @zakalwe @levitte @RegGuy

people don't seem to remember that the US South was solidly Democratic until Reagan wooed them over to the newly over-the-top racist GOP.

Orval Faubus, the governor of Arkansas who stood on the steps of a schoolhouse with a baseball bat to prevent a little black girl from setting foot inside? Democrat.

George Wallace opposed desegregation and supported the policies of "Jim Crow" during the Civil Rights Movement, declaring in his 1963 inaugural address that he stood for "segregation now, segregation tomorrow, and segregation forever."

He was an American politician who was the 45th and longest-serving governor of Alabama (1963–1967; 1971–1979; 1983–1987), and the longest-serving governor from the Democratic Party.

btw - the democratic party did not change, forcing them out. they were seduced away by someone even more racist.

Unknown parent

Jones Murphy
@roblosricos @joeinwynnewood @zakalwe @levitte @RegGuy that's not the problem at all. Grassroots bigotry and hatred is. Starting with literally insane white supremacism.
Unknown parent

in reply to Grassroots Joe

@jonesmurphy @zakalwe @roblosricos @levitte @RegGuy

the center-left has done a piss poor job of selling a far different, true story.
What if there were an effective way to sweep away the regressive-right's dog-whistles and scapegoating?
What if we could, using it, build widespread support for serious progressive reforms and make the Bernie/AOC wing of the center-left a majority?
Yeah, I'm wildly optimistic, except the way exists and works, it only needs one thing to succeed at ...

in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

@roblosricos @joeinwynnewood @zakalwe @levitte @RegGuy Rob means well, but is unaware of some of the details of how white and non-black people of color nationwide turned against Democrats immediately after Civil Rights. It wasn't just the South at all.
in reply to Jones Murphy

@jonesmurphy @roblosricos @joeinwynnewood @zakalwe @levitte @RegGuy

You're right it wasn't just the south

It's just interesting to me to see an account calling itself anarchist spouting MAGA disinformation

Rob is either extremely ignorant or a cosplaying MAGA troll spreading MAGA lies

in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

@nowayitsmae @zakalwe @joeinwynnewood @levitte @RegGuy

i will never agree with your stance on voting - not the way it's done in the US. i would totally participate in a parliamentarian type election - where the offices are divided according to how many people voted for which parties.

i'll sign up to vote if trump allows the midterms, but it's too late to register now.

AOC would totally win my vote, especially if trump runs for a 3rd term. if he's still alive. he seems to be fading.

i'm too old to be a front-line soldier. i'd best serve as a logistical support person, preparing to evacuate - and protect - our own.

i'd be doing that now, if not for my complete social isolation. portland is hell on people who don't run with the 'right' herds.

in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

@zakalwe @joeinwynnewood @levitte @ZDL @RegGuy

just when i think we've reached some kind of understaning, you have to shit all over everything.

little known fact - we won the revolution in 1974. and by 'we,' i mean I did - me and 300 kids out in the high plains of texas.

and just when it looked like we could just declare the revolution and the government would surrender, the fucking communists started assassinating anyone they could not control, including members of rival communist sects.

so, when the pentagon declared a unilateral cease-fire, we did, too.

fuck, i've had to live with this shit my whole life.

did i do the right thing? if we had pressed ahead, very likely communist infiltrators would have been part of the main attack force, and who the fuck knows what would happen then.

would the maoist declare Mao to be their leader? and invite the chinese people's liberation army in, to deal with the "reactionary forces' within the revolution?

in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

@ZDL @zakalwe @joeinwynnewood @levitte @RegGuy

the USA - killed by cowards who were comfortable enough in their lives, they didn't care that the police kill black youth with impunity, and didn't care that the US healthcare system was put under the control of corporations. and that the production of food was likewise corporatized.

who cares? as long as the idiot voters are fat and happy in front of their big-screen TVs, with a hand on their phone at all times? who cares that those phones cause genocide and mass extinction in africa? fuck africa, give me my smart phone, motherfucker, and i'll vote for a brain dead hyena, just let me have my stuff!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

you fucking pig.

voters are just another type of consumer, an insect-being, hellbent on consuming everything in the entire fucking world, like a plague of locusts.

so, get out there and consume something already, and shut your bigoted mouth.

locust boy.

Unknown parent

roblosricos

@jonesmurphy

most people considered to be 'latino' are mestizo - part european, part indigenous to the western hemisphere.

white-identified latinoes are WAY the fuck more racist than most americans ever were.

Unknown parent

Jones Murphy
@joeinwynnewood @zakalwe @roblosricos @levitte @RegGuy 15 million is false. It was 6 million. Blacks are a tiny percentage of that, and only shifted 5% to Trump as a result. Browns have overwhelmingly voted more like whites than like blacks, except for Obama. Browns returned to their normal voting.
Unknown parent

@jonesmurphy @zakalwe @roblosricos @levitte @RegGuy

The data collected says otherwise as does the fact of 15+ million Biden Skippers, including a lot of Black and brown people, who if they voted for the center-left in 2024 would have put Harris in the White House.

https://mstdn.social/@joeinwynnewood/115459568531374441


@ShredderFeeder

That number is over 15 million.

Way to Win has dug deeply into the cohort of nonvoters they've dubbed Biden Skippers, 2020 Biden voters who sat out 2024.

There are multiple episodes of their Charting The Way Forward podcast discussing their research, including surveys and focus groups, as well as conversations with folks like Terrance Woodbury, Cornell Belcher and Chuck Rocha.

Check them out at https://chartingthewayforward.buzzsprout.com/

@benroyce


Unknown parent

@joeinwynnewood @zakalwe @roblosricos @levitte @RegGuy what you write is nonsense. The center left sells fine to almost all black voters. Nobody else has any excuses whatsoever.
in reply to Grassroots Joe

@jonesmurphy @zakalwe @roblosricos @levitte @RegGuy

scale, and that's widespread use.
The way is readily available in the form of the Freedom Over Fascism Toolkit, https://bit.ly/freedom-toolkit, and I put together a doc with background material on what the underlying framework is, how it came to be and a bit of the reams of research that went into it and is ongoing to ensure the effectiveness of new material which is at https://docs.google.com/document/d/16wE1lysyAkK-17wiMuMXR5O40iOAPV6469x3WHVmpoE/edit?usp=sharing

Unknown parent

@joeinwynnewood @jonesmurphy @zakalwe @roblosricos @levitte @RegGuy

well then i should be yelling at them

what purpose does soothing the precious feelings of people who don't care supposed to achieve exactly?

not that I think yelling at them works. but it's the proper foundational attitude towards nonvoting shitbags

and it's neat how "yelling at nonvoting lumps" is a problem and not, you know, the nonvoting lumps

why are we placing these entitled assholes on a pedestal to be catered to?

Unknown parent

Grassroots Joe

@jonesmurphy @zakalwe @roblosricos @levitte @RegGuy

alert, it isn't sending Ben over to yell at them.

Should anyone care to hear about/see their work, Way to Win dug into this with Lake Research Partners/Celinda Lake, Catalist's Michael Freas, Dan Pfeiffer, Terrance Woodbury, Cornell Belcher and Chuck Rocha.
You can find all of these episodes at https://chartingthewayforward.buzzsprout.com/2415376/episodes

Written material:
https://chartingthewayforward.substack.com/p/what-we-know-about-the-millions-of
https://archive.ph/aDSim
https://waytowin.docsend.com/view/rnv5sptpzsqxy6k4
https://waytowin.docsend.com/view/f2az34zw5azsbgzv

in reply to Jones Murphy

@jonesmurphy @zakalwe @roblosricos @levitte @RegGuy

The Missing 19 Million Biden Voters and The Pilgrimage Out of Flatland
https://chartingthewayforward.buzzsprout.com/2415376/episodes/16490801-the-missing-19-million-biden-voters-and-the-pilgrimage-out-of-flatland-feat-mike-podhorzer
Podhorzer piece discussed in that episode is at https://www.weekendreading.net/p/how-trump-won

I'm pretty sure that early calculation has been paired down using Catalist's data, but definitely over 10M.

Regardless, the analysis of who is in that cohort, why they sat out and what it will take to get them to vote moving forward is what matters.

Spoiler ...

This entry was edited (4 months ago)
Unknown parent

in reply to roblosricos

Three hundred? Seriously? Three hundred kids in rural Texas are going to overthrow the Man?

Look, all due kudos to your spirit and determination, but that's straight out of Red Dawn.

in reply to roblosricos

@roblosricos @ZDL @zakalwe @joeinwynnewood @levitte @RegGuy

Rob have you ever heard of the Reichstag fire?

Are you just as ignorant as you present yourself? Or are you an agent provocateur who actively intends to help fascism, rather than merely helping it unknowingly?

Unknown parent

@roblosricos @zakalwe @joeinwynnewood @levitte @ZDL @RegGuy

Its like dealing with boyscout with an active fantasy life who thinks they live in a movie

You're 63?

That's embarrassing Rob

in reply to roblosricos

@zakalwe @joeinwynnewood @levitte @ZDL @RegGuy

and what if we had been lucky, and kept communists out of the initial attack force?

would the pentagon renege on their ceasefire if we suddenly had nuclear weapons? (that was the core of our strategy)

would i have started a civil war, with nuclear weapons?

would ultraconservative, reactionaries have fought us tooth-and-nail, so that the US became a killing field for a few centuries?

dude - that was a lot of decision-making for a 14-year-old.

the stupid thing i thought was that we won once, and it would easy enough to put it all together to do it again.

but, that turned out to be impossible. because 'vote.'

it's easy, it's convenient, and gives one a feeling of superiority over non-voters, even though there is never a candidate i would feel good about voting for, at teh state and national levels. never. i'd put damn near all of them in front of a firing squad if i could.

but, get out and vote, it's better than thinking, and a lot safer than a revolution. for you, the voter.

until it isn't.

Unknown parent

@joeinwynnewood @mls14 @jonesmurphy @zakalwe @roblosricos @levitte @RegGuy

joe i feel you

i get you

the problem is we're entering a profound period

1/3 have become fascist
1/3 don't give a shit anymore
1/3 are sane

this is well and beyond normal political science

this is more like an era of psychological disorders

Unknown parent

Grassroots Joe

@mls14 @jonesmurphy @zakalwe @roblosricos @levitte @RegGuy

Have any of you taken the time to read or listen to the material I've linked to?

Have you read Heather McGhee's book The Sum of Us?

No, I can't convey the reality of what RCGN is, how and why it works in a few 500 character posts on Social Media. It takes at bare minimum an hour plus interactive session.

If you'd like to do an hour+ video conference with me, DM your email or Signal info and I'll be happy to set it up.

Unknown parent

SouprMatt
@joeinwynnewood @jonesmurphy @zakalwe @roblosricos @levitte @RegGuy “Listen to me, I know how to get millions of people to change!” - A person who can’t even convince 6 people in a Fediverse thread.
in reply to Jones Murphy

@jonesmurphy @zakalwe @roblosricos @levitte @RegGuy

Please don't put words in my mouth I did not say. Not even close.
I am not talking about Republican no matter who for decades voters.
There is this thing called political science. They study why people vote as they do.
There's also people who study how people process information.
And there's a messaging methodology constructed using the all of that work that could move millions of voters who don't have fixed positions/ideologies...

in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

@joeinwynnewood @mls14 @zakalwe @roblosricos @levitte @RegGuy Grassroots Joe, have you read what I wrote about voter suppression, Supreme Court Republicans, white supremacist women voting away ownership of their own vaginas, and so much more?
in reply to Poul-Henning Kamp

you only get better or worse in life. at first, the choice is barely noticeable

you can sustain and iterate to even better

or you can give up and whine cynically like a coward

which has what effect?

it makes things even worse. you giving up helps the plutocrats bigots and fascists

why do you think you understand your world when all you offer it is the most pedestrian insipid "everything sucks and then you die waaah"

This entry was edited (4 months ago)
in reply to Wendroid 🇺🇦

@wendinoakland voting, it’s crossing the city with buses, not a taxi : you take the one that goes the closest to your destination and then you walk a bit.
in reply to Vive Levant

@Vive_Levant @wendinoakland
Sounds as a good metaphor, but there are whole countries where it is not clear how that "walk a bit" done?
In case if ruling party rigged elections and does not allow my candidate/party literally exist in legal space, and now arrest people for peaceful protest?
This is how terror in Georgia country happens.
How to "walk a bit" done in the latter situation?
Unknown parent

@brad @A_Minion @nikatjef @phloggen @roblosricos @dnkboston @the5thColumnist @ShredderFeeder

you at least have parliamentary, which does lend some stability and viability to 3rd parties

we don't even have that

but don't misread me: it's not a contest, the uk and usa are fucked in many ways, some unique, some similar

Unknown parent

Brad Macpherson

@A_Minion @nikatjef @phloggen @roblosricos @dnkboston @the5thColumnist @ShredderFeeder There is also a movement to bring in proportional representation which the New Tories ("Reform") made noises in favour of before they gutted the Old Tories ("Conservative and Unionist Party"). Now they're cold on the idea and could win power with around 27% of the vote under FPTP.

Only hope is for Labour to bring in voting reforms. So, I guess the UK's fucked.

Unknown parent

every #vote counts

https://alaskapublic.org/elections/2024-11-20/alaskas-ranked-choice-repeal-measure-fails-by-664-votes

#vote
This entry was edited (4 months ago)
Unknown parent

@CStamp @A_Minion @brad @nikatjef @phloggen @roblosricos @dnkboston @ShredderFeeder

Why would people vote against having more choice. What type of campaign did NO run to pull that off.

I can see PR not winning a vote because it can be difficult to explain and has some issues but ranked choice is what we used to call a No Brainer.

Unknown parent

the thing is, republicans are not disenfranchized, but they do lose with more choice in ranked choice

this is a threat to the GOP establishment

why any individual voter would want less choice is simply a matter of being incredibly stupid and brainwashed, or malicious

also, i am certain some idiot is confused by ranking choices rather than making a checkbox

like that fucking matters

This entry was edited (4 months ago)
in reply to Richard W. Woodley ELBOWS UP 🇨🇦🌹🚴‍♂️📷 🗺️

@the5thColumnist @A_Minion @brad @nikatjef @phloggen @roblosricos @dnkboston @ShredderFeeder "After an August 2022 special general election for Alaska’s U.S. House seat, Izon, who is a registered nonpartisan, said Republicans in the state felt “disenfranchised” because of ranked-choice voting."

Another comment was about older people not understanding it.

https://www.poynter.org/fact-checking/2024/why-alaska-voters-want-repeal-ranked-choice/

in reply to Carolyn

@CStamp @the5thColumnist @brad @nikatjef @phloggen @roblosricos @dnkboston @ShredderFeeder
|| I'm old and had to explain it to the younger folks. But again our red to blue ratio is right at 60/40, One of our state reps got elected because he was at Jan6th(and a west point grad, shunned by his follow grads).
Unknown parent

in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

Ben,
Your assessment of that middle 3rd is awfully generalized.
There's a whole lot of opportunity inside that 3rd.
Either we work to realize that opportunity or else maybe the "we should give up" folks are right.
I think this clip of Graham Platner from the 10/21 Pod Save America episode encapsulates my view pretty well.
This entry was edited (4 months ago)
in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

The reason they tend to lose more often is that contrary to popular belief the right wing makes up approximately 31% of registered voters. Democrats make up approximately 33%. The remainder are what Michael Smerconish calls "The Nones". They don't have a party to call home.
@CStamp @the5thColumnist @A_Minion @brad @phloggen @roblosricos @dnkboston @ShredderFeeder
Unknown parent

some of the anti-vote voices are really this dumb

some are organized troll psyop

some are pathetic victims of the psyop

This entry was edited (4 months ago)
in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

I described these evergreen threads to my husband, and his first thought was that their trolls for the Russians. I said no at first, but then I remembered how none of them can answer specific questions and start repeating themselves, almost like some reverse centaur telemarketer. So he might be right. @Wyatt_H_Knott @phloggen @roblosricos @the5thColumnist @ShredderFeeder
in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

Ranked Choice Voting is probably the single biggest thing we could do to improve our democracy and give third parties a chance...

The problem is, by the very nature of the way our democracy was built, a third party would have to still manage to get a majority to govern. While there are some "coalition governing" tricks that can be done (choosing to caucus with, etc) the third parties will always be at a disadvantage just by virtue of the fact that it takes 270 electoral votes to win. And given that it takes 2/3 of states and 2/3 of congress to undo that, i don't see fixing the electoral college as doable in our lifetimes..

If we vote for the "more left" of the two parties in every election, eventually the government will legitimately move left. But if we keep letting the right-wing win because the left leaning candidate 'wasn't lefty enough" we're doomed to fail forever.

@CStamp @the5thColumnist @A_Minion @brad @nikatjef @phloggen @roblosricos@vivaldi.net @dnkboston

in reply to Democracy Dies in Dumbass

@ShredderFeeder @CStamp @the5thColumnist @A_Minion @brad @nikatjef @phloggen @dnkboston There are state-level adjustments to the EC that could ease this - proportional electors, for instance - but power only changes when challenged
There's nothing in the US Constitution to require all of a state's electors break for the plurality

but yeah, third party is a non-starter presently

in reply to Bent Chinrest

@paneerakbari @ShredderFeeder @CStamp @the5thColumnist @A_Minion @brad @nikatjef @phloggen @dnkboston

correct me if i am wrong, but if blue states apportion electors proportional to the votes, because blue states care about fairness

while red states do not, because they are happy to cheat and give all of their blue voters to red electors

then this is self-defeating, no?

that is not to say that we shouldn't fix the EC

but that it has to be a whole fix, not piecemeal

in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

@ShredderFeeder @CStamp @the5thColumnist @A_Minion @brad @nikatjef @phloggen @dnkboston you're not wrong, like terms must be in force across the board
federal supremacy could impose that without the high bar of Constitutional action, unlikely as that seems
I guess my point is that there are loads of things that could be done, so it's disappointing how infrequently we do and how stubbornly we hold to the unattainable
in reply to Bent Chinrest

right, and my intent is not to shut down discussions. there is plenty to do piecemeal, and plenty of good new ideas out there

we just have to be mindful of the pitfalls. ideally we force nationwide change, somehow, but that bar is high

This entry was edited (4 months ago)
in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

This is why the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact (NPVIC) hasn't been enacted yet. Once they get enough states to break the 270 EC votes, then the NPVIC goes into effect and the EC votes, at least from those states who follow the NPVIC, will be allocated based on the winner of the popular vote.

Right now there are enough non-NPVIC states to pull some shitnanigans.
@paneerakbari @ShredderFeeder @CStamp @the5thColumnist @A_Minion @brad @phloggen @dnkboston

in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

It's not really as high as people think, but it does require a lot of leg work. As I stated yesterday, you start at the bottom, not at the top, and you build a broad base on school boards, dog catchers, City councils, etc. Then you move to the middle of the ballot and do the same there, before moving towards the up-ballot. Also as I said yesterday, Bhagwan Shree Rajneesh showed us the roadmap.
@paneerakbari @ShredderFeeder @CStamp @the5thColumnist @A_Minion @brad @phloggen @dnkboston
in reply to James Wells

@nikatjef @ShredderFeeder @CStamp @the5thColumnist @A_Minion @brad @phloggen @dnkboston In this regard we have a significant problem: the tools to streamline that legwork are largely captive implements of incumbent power
Local candidates campaign through FB and IG (*maybe* TT), websites are platform-exercises wholly dependent on boot-licking search engines, and the party apparatus is usually buttoned up by "professionals" contented with salary-secure losses
It's not hopeless, though
in reply to Bent Chinrest

@nikatjef @ShredderFeeder @CStamp @the5thColumnist @A_Minion @brad @phloggen @dnkboston local media, block parties, pass-the-hat speaking events, community work days - have gatherings as regular as church and organize away from techbro social. *Ce plus change*, because as much as our New Gilded Age resembles the old one, those community tactics still work
in reply to Oliver Pfleiderer 🇬🇱

probably the map maker gave up, the data exists

or maybe they use a different title or a different system where the duties of the coroner are spread out. like medical examiners and justices of the peace

This entry was edited (4 months ago)
in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

That's it. It's stated in the article for the map.
"Note that all the states without county breakdowns on the above map use a Medical Examiner system." Meaning that they have someone professionally trained to so the job... A coroner doesn't need to have medical training as far as I understand - amazing or in other words WTF.

https://mcimaps.com/halloween-2025-my-latest-deep-dive-into-the-election-of-coroners-in-america/

in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

I might repeat myself... I mean democratic elements are important but somehow training and experience do make the difference. Who would board a plane with an elected pilot without any training - no, please don't answer that, I'm not sure I wanna know.
in reply to Oliver Pfleiderer 🇬🇱

well in the usa you have rfkjr making healthcare policy, a man who doesn't believe in healthcare, only snake oil nonsense

there are indeed americans who would prefer a popular "pilot" over a competent one. maybe flying the plane on the power of religious faith

we are deeply stupid country

This entry was edited (4 months ago)
in reply to ᴮᵉⁿ ᴿᵒʸᶜᵉVOTE IN THE PRIMARIES

Ah, we had a traffic minister who said he had a different 'opinion' than the European Court. So we know how you might feel.