There’s No Good Reason to Buy a Carbon Bike
The pro racers who do need carbon fiber bikes get them for free. Only the people who don’t need them actually pay for them.Carbon fiber is light. It’s strong. It can be used to build everything from frames to seat posts to handlebars to cranks. And it’s one of the worst things that’s happened to bikes.
Now, to be clear, carbon fiber makes perfect sense for professional racing. Because it’s basically a fabric, builders can mold it into all sorts of aerodynamic shapes. Moreover, they can tune ride quality and maintain strength while simultaneously keeping the weight to a minimum in a way that’s not really possible with metal tubing. It used to be that racers had to choose between a light bike and an aero bike; now they can have both, all thanks to the miraculous properties of carbon fiber. At this point, there’s no reason for elite competitors to use anything else.
Gift Yourself More AdventureBut here’s the thing: you’re not them. I’m sorry to be the one to break it to you, but you’re almost certainly incapable of milking the handful of seconds a wind tunnel-sculpted pro-level carbon fiber race machine might theoretically net you in certain situations. Moreover, the pro racers who do need carbon fiber bikes get them for free; only the people who don’t need them actually pay for them. This means that, ipso facto, if you’ve purchased a carbon fiber bicycle, you’ve made a mistake.
“Okay, fine, I may not be Jonas Vingegaard,” you may be thinking. “Maybe I didn’t need a carbon bike. But how does that mean I’ve made a mistake?”
Simple: while you’re not able to extract carbon fiber’s small performance benefits, you are in an ideal position to experience its many drawbacks—and for normal people, carbon fiber bicycles have only drawbacks.
This is Bike Snob NYC writing for Outside Online, by the way.
like this
reshared this
Neil E. Hodges
in reply to Neil E. Hodges • •Daveography :magpie: reshared this.
Neil E. Hodges
in reply to Neil E. Hodges • •😀🚲
in reply to Neil E. Hodges • • •Neil E. Hodges likes this.
smellsofbikes
in reply to 😀🚲 • • •Neil E. Hodges likes this.
Neil E. Hodges
in reply to smellsofbikes • •Jim
in reply to Neil E. Hodges • • •Neil E. Hodges likes this.
smellsofbikes
in reply to Neil E. Hodges • • •Neil E. Hodges likes this.
NilaJones
in reply to smellsofbikes • • •That sounds heartbreaking!
smellsofbikes
in reply to NilaJones • • •Mr. Teatime
in reply to Neil E. Hodges • • •So, why recommend steel and not mention aluminium at all?
Aluminium is much lighter (and more expensive) than steel but still ductile (i.e. it bends rather than crack) if you pick the right alloy, and more rust resistant
...and it's still used in airplanes a lot :)
To me, that's the embodyment of the 80/20 rule: You get 80% of the benefit for 20% of the price.
Mind you: my main bike is a 28 year old steel bike but if I had to get a new one it'd be aluminium.
Marcel-Jan Krijgsman
in reply to Neil E. Hodges • • •I bought a Bianchi carbon bike five and a half years ago. I didn’t think it would matter much compared to my old racing bike, but I smashed all my Strava records with it.
I didn’t get it for free, but it was my best buy ever. I grew to be somewhat of a cycling fanatic. I rode about 70,000 kms on it now I think. Rode it through the Alpes about 7 times, including #tourforlife going from Italy to the Netherlands in 8 days. Also lost a couple of kgs of weight.
Adam Hunt
in reply to Neil E. Hodges • • •Neil E. Hodges likes this.