Under proposed bill SB 5514, transportation agencies would be required to install NO TURN ON RED signs at all traffic signals near certain destinations statewide. They would also be required to do so at other locations “with high levels of pedestrian traffic as determined by the appropriate local jurisdiction or the department of transportation.”
Many of the most popular trucks and SUVs in the U.S. have a horrifying lack of front-end visibility. These vehicles are not compatible with turns on red because their drivers are incapable of seeing short people (like kids) who are legally using the crosswalks in front of them.
And it's not just turns on red. Most drivers stick their noses out at an uncontrolled intersection to get a better view of the crossing traffic. They sure won't see short people trying to cross in front of them.
great idea. Don't ban the undrivable vehicles, ban an otherwise safe maneuver for everyone. It's like the people who want bikes to follow rules exactly as though a car.
I mean, I am all for banning vehicles with dangerous visibility. But also, turns on red are not perfectly safe in any vehicle. Turning vehicles encroach into crosswalk space.
@seabikeblog Right turn on red is banned on the entire island of Montreal, and honestly you don't really miss it. It makes a bunch of other operations safer for drivers and pedestrians both.
in Seattle, not having it would (barring some massive adjustment to timing) cause a ton of needless delays at uncomplicated intersections. The problem here is the monster trucks.
I'm not so sure about those delays. Waiting for a green light isn't an unreasonable ask. If there is so much turning traffic that banning turns on red would cause major delays, then the crosswalks there must be truly awful to use and in need to more protection. RTOR isn't a good mechanism for moving lots of vehicles.
We need to completely overhaul how we think about traffic signals during the night. For example, I think more intersections should become all-way stops at night when volumes drop below the point where a signal is warranted. However, protecting the free flow of traffic during the night is not a great reason to prevent safety improvements during the day.
other cities do it and I don't know why we don't. One who needs to turn left is often sitting for over 5 minutes on empty streets, unless they run the light, which many do (even though it doesn't seem like a long time when discussing it). Rules like that engender contempt for the rules in general and make us less safe, like how the 55mph national speed limit made people ignore them everywhere.
"Near those locations" is a big chunk of the city. Could Seattle comply by passing a "no turn on red" citywide, and posting it at major ingresses to the city, like we do default speed limits?
It doesn't seem from my reading that the city would be allowed to ban them citywide without installing signs at every turning location. But honestly, given how ingrained turns on red are in our culture, all those signs might be necessary.
Seattle Bike Blog
in reply to Seattle Bike Blog • • •Seattle Bike Blog
in reply to Seattle Bike Blog • • •Neil E. Hodges likes this.
Daigoro Toyama :cargo:
in reply to Seattle Bike Blog • • •Falcon Darkstar
in reply to Seattle Bike Blog • • •Seattle Bike Blog
in reply to Falcon Darkstar • • •Ben
in reply to Falcon Darkstar • • •Falcon Darkstar
in reply to Ben • • •Seattle Bike Blog
in reply to Falcon Darkstar • • •Falcon Darkstar
in reply to Seattle Bike Blog • • •Seattle Bike Blog
in reply to Falcon Darkstar • • •Falcon Darkstar
in reply to Seattle Bike Blog • • •Seattle Bike Blog
in reply to Falcon Darkstar • • •Sean Blakey
in reply to Seattle Bike Blog • • •Seattle Bike Blog
in reply to Sean Blakey • • •Neil E. Hodges
in reply to Seattle Bike Blog • •dlupham
in reply to Seattle Bike Blog • • •garland
in reply to Seattle Bike Blog • • •