Skip to main content


Here's the thing about Proton Mail:

With Proton Mail, the content of your email is fully end-to-end encrypted and inaccessible to service providers IF (and only if) you are communicating with another Proton Mail account, or you have set up a PGP key exchange otherwise.

The metadata of your email, however, isn't end-to-end encrypted. It is accessible in plain text to Proton. This includes:

  • Your payment information
  • The subject line of your emails
  • Your IP address(es), which can reveal your location
  • The email addresses you have communicated with
  • The time you have sent and received emails

If Proton is legally forced to provide this information to law enforcement, they will. They have to.

If your threat model makes it that it's dangerous for you when this metadata is shared, you need to use another, more private, method of communication.

#ProtonMail #Privacy

in reply to Em :official_verified:

Does PGP protect subject lines or recipient addresses? (Not sure how that last one would be possible in the email world)
Unknown parent

Em :official_verified:

@frank There are already many other more private ways to communicate than emails, but alas they are much less user-friendly, interoperable, and popular.

But it's important to pick the right technology for each task and protection we might need.

Unknown parent

Ben Royce 🇺🇦 🇸🇩

@delaney @frank
this is it

have a proton email account, by all means

use it for "Dear Illustrious Business Associate, I am writing to inform you..." type bullshit

and then strictly wall off genuinely private and sensitive information into other communication channels

it's a form of discipline everyone needs to practice

Unknown parent

@frank *cough* Signal *cough*

email has its place, but not for private communications.

in reply to Em :official_verified:

Yeah - there never really has been secure email.

Threat modeling still matters, apparently.

in reply to Ben Royce 🇺🇦 🇸🇩

@benroyce @delaney @frank I use my gmail for music software marketer lists because sometimes they have coupon codes or free plugins. That way Gemini is just fed with offers for music software. But Proton...not happy about that since I PAY for that.
in reply to Ben Royce 🇺🇦 🇸🇩

@benroyce nah, I just canceled mine. Their VPN is garbage anyway and I haven't used it in months. Also told them to go fuck themselves.
in reply to Em :official_verified:

just a reminder that #proton is run by a republican boot licking tech bro

so regardless of the nonevent of this news cycle kerfuffle predicated on people not understanding their level of exposure, it's ok to give proton the middle finger just based on who runs it

in reply to Ben Royce 🇺🇦 🇸🇩

@benroyce Has anyone recently said: if email did not exist and we wanted to invent it, what would we build?

Telnet and ftp are basically extinct. SMTP goes back to that era. If you were inventing email today and wanted to avoid all the current problems, what would you build?

in reply to mike805

i have no fucking clue but i do know a million minds have examined the problem

one particular solution is mentioned in this thread:

https://mastodon.social/@snork303@toot.community/116185621889618413


@jamesmarshall
I'll add a little more. I was there, testing and using it. Highly secure. Roger Dingledine was heavily involved, you can see what evolved from it.
I think a few operators still exist, but last time I tried there weren't enough of them to make a decent chain.

@Em0nM4stodon @frank


This entry was edited (8 hours ago)
in reply to Ben Royce 🇺🇦 🇸🇩

@benroyce All of them looking down the narrow tunnel of "how do we fix SMTP?"

We need a new email system that is "better enough" so that people will use them in parallel. And eventually people will put an autoresponder on their old email that says "use the new email."

WhatsApp, evil though that is, replaced SMS in exactly that way: it became rude to send SMS because you were imposing an avoidable cost on the other party. And you were likely to get ignored if you did that.

in reply to mike805

@mike805
eh

the telephone is dead

email is dying as well in terms of "primary importance"

there's no need to make a conscious effort

it will just fade away

in reply to Ben Royce 🇺🇦 🇸🇩

@benroyce The telephone is not remotely dead. Being able to talk to another human is still a very useful function given that most people have speaking and hearing apparatus built in. (Having text comms universally available is very liberating for those who are not so equipped.)

The proof of this is that every motor vehicle includes a Bluetooth phone interface.

Email is an official rather than real time communication medium, but still necessary for sending files and notices.

in reply to mike805

@mike805
i mean we still watch tv and listen to the radio too

no communication channel ever truly dies

but it certainly fades into ever increasing irrelevancy

so it is with email

in reply to Ben Royce 🇺🇦 🇸🇩

@benroyce We need the service that email provides. We just need to fix the brokenness of SMTP. For example, an email address should be the hash of a public key. There should be no file size limits on attachments. And you should be able to set a cost - financial or computational - for a stranger to contact you. The latter is the obvious way to suppress spam.
in reply to Ben Royce 🇺🇦 🇸🇩

@benroyce I tried back in the 2010s. The service does work and I used it a lot. It could be brought up to date if there is a group of people interested. There is a technical description here. https://www.confidantmail.org/
in reply to Ben Royce 🇺🇦 🇸🇩

@benroyce Aside from a mobile client, what do you think it needs? It was python 2 and worked on Linux, Mac, and Windows.
in reply to Ben Royce 🇺🇦 🇸🇩

@benroyce If you have time have a look through the docs on the site please. I have lots of screenshots. It basically looks like Thunderbird. You can send unlimited size attachments with it, and can forward an email with the signature intact.
in reply to Ben Royce 🇺🇦 🇸🇩

@benroyce If this is not solved, Google is eventually going to impose ever-increasing pain on everyone else until you have to use Gmail. They are just looking for an excuse to cut off IMAP, for example. Right now you have to reset your IMAP app passwords every time your main password changes.
in reply to Ben Royce 🇺🇦 🇸🇩

@benroyce
the irony that i opened a proton email to get away from gmail as part of my #BreakTheOligarchy effort

but now i have to find a new email because of my #magafree #antifascist effort😞

in reply to Ben Royce 🇺🇦 🇸🇩

@benroyce I am well aware, and I greatly dislike this. But I have seen people using this as an excuse to stay with Google, which has a much worse CEO, a CEO that directly gave money to Trump, and operates a horrible email service based solely on selling people's data. I'd much rather people use Proton. This is about harm reduction.
in reply to Em :official_verified:

@benroyce

Agreed. But there's no need to promote Proton. They're running on a campaign of »epic military-grade privacy« while that doesn't make sense for email in the first place. Email is a protocol, not a service, and the protocol is not private.

If you really want to use E2EE over email, you can do that already with any provider (but let's be honest, nobody does).

So let's promote actually good providers instead:
https://mailbox.org/en/ @mailbox_org
https://posteo.de/en
https://www.fastmail.com/ @fastmail

This entry was edited (6 hours ago)
in reply to Wouter 🇳🇱🇧🇷🇧🇪

@AccordingtoWouter @teun @mailbox_org @fastmail

This is just PR damage control. He said what he said. I don't understand this "sure he pissed in the fruit punch for the party, but he's a really nice guy" mode of discourse. It's not about being overly judgmental and purity politics, it's about red flags about a business we are supposed to trust. If you go on a date and they're wonderful, then on the way out they kick a dog, it really doesn't matter anymore how great the date was

in reply to Ben Royce 🇺🇦 🇸🇩

and what he exactly said? That the pick from Trump is great because he is against big tech? In fact then it IS a great pick.
This entry was edited (4 hours ago)
in reply to Wouter 🇳🇱🇧🇷🇧🇪

😂 oh yeah, mustn't forget the integrity and competency of trump picks. no corruption or shady agendas, nope, mmm

you really believe that is accurate?

This entry was edited (4 hours ago)
in reply to Ben Royce 🇺🇦 🇸🇩

@benroyce @teun I don't know. It was one message on X where he didn't actually support Trump or anything, but someone who has a history of opposing big tech. He doesn't support anything else about Trump; on the contrary, he supports causes that oppose Trump. Proton's latest donation was to European Digital Rights (EDRi).

And I know personally how quickly statements can be taken out of context.

Unknown parent

@frank my mind wanders.... it may be possible to create an onion-routing kind of thing where an email gets routed through multiple nodes, each one decrypting and forwarding to the next node, in such a way that no node sees any nodes not directly adjacent to it, and in particular no node sees both the sender and receiver of an email. But this would be something specialized built on top of SMTP, not really SMTP itself.
in reply to James M.

@jamesmarshall
Been done a long time ago, look up the mixmaster remailer network and nyms.
Kick in the pants.

@Em0nM4stodon @frank

in reply to John K

@jamesmarshall
I'll add a little more. I was there, testing and using it. Highly secure. Roger Dingledine was heavily involved, you can see what evolved from it.
I think a few operators still exist, but last time I tried there weren't enough of them to make a decent chain.

@Em0nM4stodon @frank

in reply to Em :official_verified:

Did that blackberry the state department used overcome these security issues?
in reply to Em :official_verified:

@frank @RnDanger For example, I telepathically communicate with my kitty cats for my purrfect private conversations :3
in reply to Em :official_verified:

and that's why noone should use #ProtonMail and their shitty #PGP setup!

in reply to Kevin Karhan :verified:

@kkarhan Proton does exactly what it says it does. It doesn't do everything that everyone wants or needs it to do, but it doesn't claim to.

At least half the complaints I ever hear about anything are from people using the wrong tool for the wrong thing, and getting upset when they find out the hard way.

There's a reason bank robbers don't hire Uber to drive them to bank jobs, and it's not because Uber fails to deliver what they promise, or rolls over for the Man out of spite.

in reply to Em :official_verified:

genuine question: why do we still try to make email a fully secure method of communication after decades of failing at it?

It feels like legacy technology that works well enough to not be replaced, but lacks features needed in the modern world :neocat_think: