I'm trying to grasp whether the magnitude of Epstein's influence with politicians and capitalists is more about "personal foreign and domestic affairs" or "national foreign and domestic affairs" when viewed in the light of extreme corruption. Is the question even valid?
People of that "class" probably view themselves as Citizens of the World. Whether Epstein was a "useful idiot" to Putin, the wealthy oligarchs you don't hear about so much ( internationally and domestically ), we may never know. He was a bigger cog in the machine than previously revealed.
I think it has something to do with the craziness that power creates in small minds and the fact that their misdeeds make for great blackmail material for those grasping for more power.
Nothing to do with personal wealth, status and a bunch of birds of a feather flocking together, then? Everyone out for themselves and using each other, plus anyone else they can get their hands on.
Mark Wollschlager
in reply to Brian Fitzgerald • • •Brian Fitzgerald likes this.
Katherine Bond
in reply to Brian Fitzgerald • • •Brian Fitzgerald likes this.
Simon J Ashcroft
in reply to Brian Fitzgerald • • •like this
Brian Fitzgerald and Katherine Bond like this.
Katherine Bond
in reply to Brian Fitzgerald • • •like this
Simon J Ashcroft and Brian Fitzgerald like this.
Brian Fitzgerald
in reply to Brian Fitzgerald • • •Is that what you get if you cross the ideas of Norman Vincent Peale with Peter Thiel?
Katherine Bond likes this.
Katherine Bond
in reply to Brian Fitzgerald • • •Brian Fitzgerald likes this.
Simon J Ashcroft
in reply to Brian Fitzgerald • • •like this
Brian Fitzgerald and Katherine Bond like this.
Katherine Bond
in reply to Brian Fitzgerald • • •like this
Brian Fitzgerald and Simon J Ashcroft like this.