Skip to main content


I wonder what would frighten the Trumpster enough to prefer confessing to all of his misdeeds to comitting something even more outrageous as a distraction.

#incentive

Neil E. Hodges reshared this.

in reply to Brian Fitzgerald

You'd have to tie him down and do to him what he did to all those girls (and boys - there's evidence for that, too). Not merely threaten it but actually start doing it. Then he'd admit what he did. Outside of that, you'd need a Compel Truth out of a fantasy roleplaying game.
in reply to Brian Fitzgerald

He would not get frightened after the amputation, but if he sees a rusty saw blade approaching, that might do the trick...
in reply to Brian Fitzgerald

I prefer a clean break. Roll out the tumbrels, fill ‘em up and head toward Madame Guillotine.
in reply to Brian Fitzgerald

You bet! We will not give in to these morons!!! They are NOT America.
in reply to Brian Fitzgerald

Although I understand the incentive, I must still ask; "Does an exclusionary democracy diminish its own legitimacy?"
in reply to Brian Fitzgerald

When they become enemies of the people, they’re traitors.
in reply to Brian Fitzgerald

What legitimacy has a democracy that installs the filthy rich plunderbusses into office? That is true here, also, as well as the issue of a minority of votes creating improbable majorities.

I cannot speak for the US, but I do not regard the UK as democratic. It's run by an elite that peddles bullshit to the prejudiced.

in reply to Brian Fitzgerald

How do you define democracy, and representative democracy in particular?
in reply to Brian Fitzgerald

We’re a Plutocracy right now. Not going to be. We ARE.
in reply to Brian Fitzgerald

I would expect a media constitutionally required to report facts, not opinion, in an unbiased manner, and strictly proportional representation.

Also, a property disqualification on the super-rich holding office, and a tax system heavily weighted toward wealth redistribution.

in reply to Brian Fitzgerald

“When it gets down to having to use violence, then you are playing the system’s game. The establishment will irritate you – pull your beard, flick your face – to make you fight. Because once they’ve got you violent, then they know how to handle you. The only thing they don’t know how to handle is non-violence and humor.” ― John Lennon
in reply to Brian Fitzgerald

I'm not sure a good many overthrown governments would agree.
in reply to Brian Fitzgerald

Did the overthrowers fare well over the long term?
in reply to Brian Fitzgerald

Does any government, long term? It's a continual readjustment.
in reply to Brian Fitzgerald

Minnesota has a shutdown protest going today, no working and no shopping.
The orange baboon is looking for violence so he can declare Martial Law.
in reply to Brian Fitzgerald

He also wants people afraid this year so they won’t go out to vote. He knows the congressional races this year will be a bloodbath for his party.
in reply to Brian Fitzgerald

I'm not fighting for inner piece, just acknowledging that equity and social justice sometimes requires more than a sweet smile and bit of cajoling.
in reply to Brian Fitzgerald

There is far more to "not fighting" than that.
in reply to Brian Fitzgerald

Allow the inertia of your opponent to carry them to their own demise without your interference.
in reply to Brian Fitzgerald

However, you have to protect those who are being physically injured.
in reply to Brian Fitzgerald

It can take a long time for an oppressive state to collapse under its own inertia.

Admittedly, yours might be not far off that. Then again...

in reply to Brian Fitzgerald

We’re not close enough. Too many could die in the meantime or be illegally arrested.
in reply to Brian Fitzgerald

It can take far less time for critical supports to fail, especially while unduly stressed.
in reply to Brian Fitzgerald

I do not think you were regarding inertia as momentum rather than dead weight.