Skip to main content


Content warning: Rant re: Signal Shills being dangerous Tech Illiterates

in reply to Kevin Karhan :verified:

The only ones, who are cultists, are those, who claim random BS without evidence, and include a million hashtags in their posts in order to get a tiny bit of attention for their conspiracy theories.

I do expect public apologies from every single one of you shills


Why do you sound like such a whiny loser in all of your posts? 😂 This is ridiculous

This entry was edited (4 weeks ago)
in reply to Andromxda 🇺🇦🇵🇸🇹🇼

please seek professional help, #shitposter!

You obviously need some.
https://infosec.exchange/@Andromxda/114234661122716651


The only ones, who are cultists, are those, who claim random BS without evidence, and include a million hashtags in their posts in order to get a tiny bit of attention for their conspiracy theories.
I do expect public apologies from every single one of you shills


Why do you sound like such a whiny loser in all of your posts? 😂 This is ridiculous


This entry was edited (4 weeks ago)
in reply to Kevin Karhan :verified:

Content warning: Rant re: Signal Shills being dangerous Tech Illiterates

in reply to Kevin Karhan :verified:

Content warning: Rant re: Signal Shills being dangerous Tech Illiterates

This entry was edited (2 weeks ago)
in reply to Kevin Karhan :verified:

Content warning: re: Rant re: Signal Shills being dangerous Tech Illiterates

Kevin Karhan :verified: reshared this.

in reply to adison verlice

@adisonverlice it's not just re: #Governments (tho #Project2025 explicitly endorses unsactioned comms to twart attempts at #FIOA or any #accountability for that matter), but individuals or any organization:

And if #EncroChat got pwned, who's gonna guarantee @signalapp won't if it's actually secure or isn't an #InsideJob like #ANØM.

After all, both #Signal's Organization and key people like @Mer__edith are known to the authorities by more than just their legal name.

  • What's gonna prevent #Trump from doing a "bag&drag" on her or getting his goons to put a gun on,the developers' heads and force them to,#d0x all users and #backdoor everything (if they didn't already got forced to have some "#LafwulInterception" gear in a closet like #Room641A...

After all, Signal can't pull the 5th and refuse to comply!

in reply to Kevin Karhan :verified:

I mean, they could, but then they'd have to pull a lavabit and shut down. but then again, I don't know, because they've done shady things before.
in reply to adison verlice

yeah, @signalapp pushing a #Shitcoin-#Scam called #MobileCoin should already discredit them.

Anything else is just #Shitcoins!

This entry was edited (1 week ago)
in reply to Kevin Karhan :verified:

yeah, I wonder how "private" it actually is. but i'd need to test that by looking at the Blockchain, otherwise I have no idea.
but yeah they could (and should) just entigrate monero rather than whatever it is they've got now

Kevin Karhan :verified: reshared this.

in reply to Kevin Karhan :verified:

personally, I think @signalapp should not have integrated any #wallet or #cryptocurrency at all and instead not eben request #PhoneNumbers (which are #PII) and move tueir system onto #Tor and have their endpoints as #OnionServce, because being a #PaymentProcessor (and lets be honest #MobileCoin got pitched for #payments) is at best a "legal nightmare" if not a straight-up "You go to Jail!"-card as a matter f principle!

Anyone who wants to coordinate #payments and #finance can do so with external wallets like #FeatherWallet anyway.


yeah, I wonder how "private" it actually is. but i'd need to test that by looking at the Blockchain, otherwise I have no idea.
but yeah they could (and should) just entigrate monero rather than whatever it is they've got now

in reply to Kevin Karhan :verified:

yeah I think tor isn't meant to be "private".
sure, they don't collect nearly as much information as Whatsapp, but I wouldn't consider it "privacy friendly" either. you're right phone numbers are PII.
I think if I wanted "private' messaging, I'd either use session or briar
in reply to adison verlice

@adisonverlice I think that's dangerous disinfo as @torproject actively works against attempts to fingerprint and track #Tor users.

  • I do consider Tor more private than any #VPN simply becaise they can neither ban users nor identify them.

In fact, Tor has been designed with the explicit goal to circumvent #Firewalls and #InternetCensorship methods like #DeepApcketInspection.

As a matter of principle I'd never vouch for any #centralized, #SingleVendor and/or #SingleProvider solution of any kind, including #Session.

  • Tor is sufficiently decentralized in that it is not only completely #OpenSource but has proven to not have SPOFs in the form of maintainers and is able to yeet proplematic folks (unlike #WikiLeaks!)…
in reply to Kevin Karhan :verified:

o yea I forgot about onion share. that works too.
I think it is also used to host some websites, though correct me if i'm wrong